Archived Thread

Question about the blocked XP

DC Gmen Fan : 2/12/2024 11:58 am

why is the kicker being blamed for "missing" the XP when KC clearly got penetration to block it? I did hear them say he kicked it lower, but it didn't look any different than other kicks. Just picking on the kicker?

They didn't get penetration

Mike from Ohio : 2/12/2024 12:09 pm : link

The kick was low and blocked by guys simply jumping up. It wasn't a good kick.

O line got blown back

Starke86 : 2/12/2024 2:00 pm : link

If you watch the left side of the O line got blown into the back field. The kick might have been low but there was too much penetration.

Two things can be true

allstarjim : 2/12/2024 2:02 pm : link

blocking wasn't there and the kick was too low. The kick was definitely low.

For similar reasons why QBs get charged with an INT

logman : 2/12/2024 2:03 pm : link

that goes off Evan Engram's hands into the arms of a defender.

RE: They didn't get penetration

Amtoft : 2/12/2024 2:15 pm : link

In comment 16396679 Mike from Ohio said:

Quote:

The kick was low and blocked by guys simply jumping up. It wasn't a good kick.

They most definitely did... One guy was on the ground on the left side while the other was about to go flying backwards. They got blown up.

Feeley blamed the kicker...

Chris in Philly : 2/12/2024 3:24 pm : link

and I figure he knows better than anyone.