for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Duggan: NYG feels urgency to address QB

Sean : 3/2/2024 12:51 pm
Quote:
The Giants are exploring the cost of trading up, although it’s not believed the Chicago Bears or Washington Commanders will make the first or second picks available. The swing team is the New England Patriots, who have the No. 3 pick.

Quote:
It would be costly for the Giants to jump from the sixth pick to No. 3 — it cost the Jets three second-round picks in an identical trade up for quarterback Sam Darnold in 2018 — but league sources believe Schoen would pull the trigger on such a bold move. The sense around the league is that this regime feels urgency to add a quarterback entering a pivotal third season.

Quote:
If Schoen can’t swing a trade for one of the top three quarterbacks, the focus would shift to McCarthy. There’s debate about his worthiness for the sixth pick, but the expectation is that a quarterback who had a 27-1 record as a starter at Michigan will win over teams during the pre-draft process.

Link - ( New Window )
McCarthy = Desperation  
jeff57 : 3/2/2024 12:54 pm : link
Reach for a QB at your peril.
I would be  
GiantGrit : 3/2/2024 12:57 pm : link
Absolutely shocked if the Giants picked McCarthy at 6.
McCarthy just measured  
Dave on the UWS : 3/2/2024 12:58 pm : link
over 6-3 and 219 pounds. Not much smaller than Maye. He's going top 8 for sure. NOT a reach at 6. Is he the right "fit" is the big question.
so  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 3/2/2024 12:59 pm : link
yet another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.
RE: I would be  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 3/2/2024 12:59 pm : link
In comment 16414091 GiantGrit said:
Quote:
Absolutely shocked if the Giants picked McCarthy at 6.


Really? I wouldn't be shocked at all.
RE: I would be  
Rjanyg : 3/2/2024 1:00 pm : link
In comment 16414091 GiantGrit said:
Quote:
Absolutely shocked if the Giants picked McCarthy at 6.


Grit,

Would you be shocked if they took Nix at 6?
 
christian : 3/2/2024 1:01 pm : link
I'd prefer the Giants give up their number one next year, and use their second round picks to move into round again this year.
RE: RE: I would be  
Rjanyg : 3/2/2024 1:01 pm : link
In comment 16414096 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
In comment 16414091 GiantGrit said:


Quote:


Absolutely shocked if the Giants picked McCarthy at 6.



Really? I wouldn't be shocked at all.


Me neither.
Desperation is the perfect word for  
AROCK1000 : 3/2/2024 1:03 pm : link
Taking JJ at 6
Why is it desperation to take McCarthy at six?  
Sean : 3/2/2024 1:11 pm : link
This is what Eric talks about with the armchair QB analysts on this site. If Daboll & Schoen like McCarthy and Daboll feels he can work with his skill set, why wouldn't you draft him? That's a huge part of the reason Daboll was hired in the first place.

If it's Jones PTSD, that's an easy fix. Don't get lazy with the QB position like you did after 2019, look to bring in good competition each year in the mid to later rounds.
RE: McCarthy just measured  
GFAN52 : 3/2/2024 1:14 pm : link
In comment 16414094 Dave on the UWS said:
Quote:
over 6-3 and 219 pounds. Not much smaller than Maye. He's going top 8 for sure. NOT a reach at 6. Is he the right "fit" is the big question.


Not over 6'3", he measured 6'2 4/8" and 219 lbs to be exact.
Some  
Toth029 : 3/2/2024 1:15 pm : link
Who keep saying it's desperate but don't explain why.
RE: so  
ThomasG : 3/2/2024 1:19 pm : link
In comment 16414095 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
yet another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.


Story is certainly getting more widespread.

They may not be able to pull off what they want to do but there is little denying what they want to do.
RE: …  
Rjanyg : 3/2/2024 1:20 pm : link
In comment 16414100 christian said:
Quote:
I'd prefer the Giants give up their number one next year, and use their second round picks to move into round again this year.


I agree. Get your QB at 6, trade back into the 1st to get WR.
RE: RE: McCarthy just measured  
Rjanyg : 3/2/2024 1:21 pm : link
In comment 16414126 GFAN52 said:
Quote:
In comment 16414094 Dave on the UWS said:


Quote:


over 6-3 and 219 pounds. Not much smaller than Maye. He's going top 8 for sure. NOT a reach at 6. Is he the right "fit" is the big question.



Not over 6'3", he measured 6'2 4/8" and 219 lbs to be exact.


So 6’ 2.5 “
If Daniel Jones is 100% healthy he is their qb, to pick a qb in  
Jack Stroud : 3/2/2024 1:21 pm : link
the 1st rd will set the franchise back 5 years. The Giants have so many other areas of need they can not pass up drafting a player who can come in and contribute immediately. Sure, the draft is a crap shoot but not picking a player who you think can play right away is just a bad move.
RE: If Daniel Jones is 100% healthy he is their qb, to pick a qb in  
ThomasG : 3/2/2024 1:24 pm : link
In comment 16414137 Jack Stroud said:
Quote:
the 1st rd will set the franchise back 5 years. The Giants have so many other areas of need they can not pass up drafting a player who can come in and contribute immediately. Sure, the draft is a crap shoot but not picking a player who you think can play right away is just a bad move.


Generally agree with a lot of these points.

Except I just can't get beyond the fact that Daniel Jones isn't any good.
Duggan  
BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit : 3/2/2024 1:26 pm : link
May be the most dialed in of the beats.

It's either old times again at the meadowlands with loose lips OR it is intentional smoke.

Based on this regime being pretty tight on info so far I'd say most likely smoke.



RE: I would be  
jeff57 : 3/2/2024 1:28 pm : link
In comment 16414091 GiantGrit said:
Quote:
Absolutely shocked if the Giants picked McCarthy at 6.


I wouldn’t be shocked. They picked Jones there.
RE: Some  
jeff57 : 3/2/2024 1:30 pm : link
In comment 16414127 Toth029 said:
Quote:
Who keep saying it's desperate but don't explain why.


Because he’s not a top 10 pick.
RE: If Daniel Jones is 100% healthy he is their qb, to pick a qb in  
Mike from Ohio : 3/2/2024 1:30 pm : link
In comment 16414137 Jack Stroud said:
Quote:
the 1st rd will set the franchise back 5 years. The Giants have so many other areas of need they can not pass up drafting a player who can come in and contribute immediately. Sure, the draft is a crap shoot but not picking a player who you think can play right away is just a bad move.


There is something to this. Picking Jones in the 1st round absolutely set the franchise back 5 years. Hopefully it won’t take this crew 5 years to realize if whoever they pick can’t play the position.
RE: Duggan  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 3/2/2024 1:30 pm : link
In comment 16414145 BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit said:
Quote:
May be the most dialed in of the beats.

It's either old times again at the meadowlands with loose lips OR it is intentional smoke.

Based on this regime being pretty tight on info so far I'd say most likely smoke.




Not sure how the Giants making other teams think they want a QB helps them. The non-QBs will be there.
RE: RE: Some  
Toth029 : 3/2/2024 1:32 pm : link
In comment 16414156 jeff57 said:
Quote:
In comment 16414127 Toth029 said:


Quote:


Who keep saying it's desperate but don't explain why.



Because he’s not a top 10 pick.


Why? If Daboll covets him, why not?
Could it be the same story being repeated?  
George from PA : 3/2/2024 1:32 pm : link
Not an avalanche of input.

I would absolutely love JJ as the pick at 6  
GiantBlue : 3/2/2024 1:33 pm : link
But he may go higher…..he could ascend as time goes along.
RE: McCarthy = Desperation  
jvm52106 : 3/2/2024 1:37 pm : link
In comment 16414081 jeff57 said:
Quote:
Reach for a QB at your peril.


Why, because you feel that way?
Desperate isn't the right word  
bceagle05 : 3/2/2024 1:37 pm : link
but if they're aggressively trying to trade up (as has been reported) and fail to do so, taking McCarthy at six would seem like settling. I think that's the issue people would have with it, and it's a legit concern.
RE: I would absolutely love JJ as the pick at 6  
ThomasG : 3/2/2024 1:38 pm : link
In comment 16414164 GiantBlue said:
Quote:
But he may go higher…..he could ascend as time goes along.


How nice that would be for us.
Sticking with Jones is desperate  
HardTruth : 3/2/2024 1:41 pm : link

des·per·ate
/ˈdesp(ə)rət/
adjective
feeling, showing, or involving a hopeless sense that a situation is so bad as to be impossible to deal with.

Because when you are desperate you cling to any hope no matter how small and you are afraid of losing what you have even when you have nothing.

Believing Jones will stay healthy and become something he has never been; not in HS, not in college and not in his 5 year NFL career is desperate.

And being afraid to do something new and different because you are too afraid to is desperate. Ie “we have so many holes we can’t draft a QB.” ‘There’s no sure thing at QB. Let’s just stick with Jones.

RE: Desperate isn't the right word  
HardTruth : 3/2/2024 1:42 pm : link
In comment 16414173 bceagle05 said:
Quote:
but if they're aggressively trying to trade up (as has been reported) and fail to do so, taking McCarthy at six would seem like settling. I think that's the issue people would have with it, and it's a legit concern.


Why is it ok to “settle’ for any position. Like say taking the 3rd WR out of 3?
Take a QB with every pick and then we might have enough to make it  
JohnB : 3/2/2024 1:42 pm : link
through another season with an awful OLine.

Fix the OLine or the QBs will get IRed one after another
RE: RE: McCarthy = Desperation  
jeff57 : 3/2/2024 1:45 pm : link
In comment 16414172 jvm52106 said:
Quote:
In comment 16414081 jeff57 said:


Quote:


Reach for a QB at your peril.



Why, because you feel that way?


That’s my opinion.
RE: RE: RE: McCarthy just measured  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 1:46 pm : link
In comment 16414136 Rjanyg said:
Quote:
In comment 16414126 GFAN52 said:


Quote:


In comment 16414094 Dave on the UWS said:


Quote:


over 6-3 and 219 pounds. Not much smaller than Maye. He's going top 8 for sure. NOT a reach at 6. Is he the right "fit" is the big question.



Not over 6'3", he measured 6'2 4/8" and 219 lbs to be exact.



So 6’ 2.5 “


Looks like he has about the same body type as Aaron Rodgers and Matthew Stafford. 6'2.5" is a solid height for a QB. Give him some time in the NFL while DJ holds it down and he will be playing at 225-230lbs 6'2.5", hands are a bit smaller like Joe Burrows but he has played with cold weather in the Midwest his whole football career growing up in Illinois and playing at Michigan. If we can't get Jayden Daniels then I want JJM without trading much more than future picks (future 3rd or 4th and 5th should get it done for the Chargers).
probably have to give up on of the  
Dave on the UWS : 3/2/2024 1:49 pm : link
2s. Lots of teams are going to want to move to 5. the Chargers are not likely to want to drop past 6 to grab one of Bowers, Alt or the 2 WRs.
RE: RE: Desperate isn't the right word  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 1:49 pm : link
In comment 16414181 HardTruth said:
Quote:
In comment 16414173 bceagle05 said:


Quote:


but if they're aggressively trying to trade up (as has been reported) and fail to do so, taking McCarthy at six would seem like settling. I think that's the issue people would have with it, and it's a legit concern.



Why is it ok to “settle’ for any position. Like say taking the 3rd WR out of 3?


If the NFL thinks there are 4 top qb prospects and many think JJM is a better prospect than Drake Maye, then it isn't a desperate reach. JJM I'm is a vastly superior prospect compared to DJ out of Duke. I would be disappointed but still excited if JJM was taken before Maye and we ended up with Maye. The only QB I would trade up to 3 for is Jayden Daniels.
Focus is too much on who will drop or how much is needed to move up  
Ivan15 : 3/2/2024 1:50 pm : link
Focus should be on which QB will Daboll want. Think about QBs Daboll has worked with and which ones fit his offense. Giants aren’t going to squander a draft pick on a QB that doesn’t suit the HC. Unless Daboll is a lot more flexible than I think he is, he is only interested in Maye, McCarthy or Nix. Probably only interested in one of those.

Maye probably won’t be available at 6 so if he is the guy, they will have to trade up.. McCarthy might be there but they probably need to trade up to 3 to be sure. Nix probably will be there and no move up is needed.
All  
AcidTest : 3/2/2024 1:51 pm : link
this "smoke" from many beat writers probably means that Giants are in fact strongly trying to move up to #3. That would be a huge mistake IMO, especially since it would cost a lot more than the three second round picks the Jets gave up to move from #6 to #3. I would prefer not to take McCarthy at #6, but could live with doing so.
RE: probably have to give up on of the  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 1:51 pm : link
In comment 16414193 Dave on the UWS said:
Quote:
2s. Lots of teams are going to want to move to 5. the Chargers are not likely to want to drop past 6 to grab one of Bowers, Alt or the 2 WRs.


Well that's the thing, if the Chargers don't want to miss out on their guy then they take a future 3rd or 4th and 5th. The Eagles traded a future 4th to move up from 10 to 9 so I figure we could get it with at most a future 3rd and 5th.
McCarthy is more than worthy  
ElitoCanton : 3/2/2024 1:52 pm : link
I've been saying so for months. I like him more than Daniels. Kid's arm talent is special. I think the Giants will trade up to 4 to secure McCarthy.
Can’t see the Pats giving up on both  
UConn4523 : 3/2/2024 1:54 pm : link
QB and Harrison. Cardinals and Chargers could work.
The prospect that we're finally going to move on  
Go Terps : 3/2/2024 1:54 pm : link
Bring in McCarthy and Pratt or Rattler later on  
Chris684 : 3/2/2024 1:55 pm : link
Tell DeVito to get into the pasta sauce business full time and let the 2 draftees develop and overtake Jones.
RE: McCarthy is more than worthy  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 1:55 pm : link
In comment 16414200 ElitoCanton said:
Quote:
I've been saying so for months. I like him more than Daniels. Kid's arm talent is special. I think the Giants will trade up to 4 to secure McCarthy.


You really think the Cardinals will pass on MHJ and trade down? I just don't see that myself, but if Schoen thought they were going to do it then we would have to pull the trigger.
RE: RE: McCarthy is more than worthy  
ElitoCanton : 3/2/2024 1:57 pm : link
Yes. They can still get one of the top two receivers in such a trade down. Makes sense for them.

In comment 16414211 BleedBlue46 said:
Quote:
In comment 16414200 ElitoCanton said:


Quote:


I've been saying so for months. I like him more than Daniels. Kid's arm talent is special. I think the Giants will trade up to 4 to secure McCarthy.



You really think the Cardinals will pass on MHJ and trade down? I just don't see that myself, but if Schoen thought they were going to do it then we would have to pull the trigger.
RE: The prospect that we're finally going to move on  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 1:57 pm : link
In comment 16414209 Go Terps said:
Quote:


Hahaha. I've been feeling McCarthy to the Giants for a while. That's what led me to do a deep dive of research on him and my perspective on him completely changed. I used to think like many here think about him: average nothing special college football game manager. After watching all 22 and researching him thoroughly, I see what a lot of the pros see. There is a lot more to JJM than you see when casually watching the stats and live games.
Well I wouldn't be shocked. Sy has JJ over  
Blue21 : 3/2/2024 1:59 pm : link
Maye . So some see him worthy .
RE: RE: RE: McCarthy is more than worthy  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 2:00 pm : link
In comment 16414212 ElitoCanton said:
Quote:
Yes. They can still get one of the top two receivers in such a trade down. Makes sense for them.

In comment 16414211 BleedBlue46 said:


Quote:


In comment 16414200 ElitoCanton said:


Quote:


I've been saying so for months. I like him more than Daniels. Kid's arm talent is special. I think the Giants will trade up to 4 to secure McCarthy.



You really think the Cardinals will pass on MHJ and trade down? I just don't see that myself, but if Schoen thought they were going to do it then we would have to pull the trigger.



Yeah of they have Nabers or Odunze graded closely enough then it makes sense. I just see MHJ as the clear cut most surefire and generational talent in this draft. I wouldn't pass up on him for Nabers or Odunze +picks.
RE: All  
Sean : 3/2/2024 2:01 pm : link
In comment 16414196 AcidTest said:
Quote:
this "smoke" from many beat writers probably means that Giants are in fact strongly trying to move up to #3. That would be a huge mistake IMO, especially since it would cost a lot more than the three second round picks the Jets gave up to move from #6 to #3. I would prefer not to take McCarthy at #6, but could live with doing so.

If the QB is good, no one will care.
McCarthy is not the guy that I'd pick,  
Go Terps : 3/2/2024 2:01 pm : link
but I want Schoen to draft the guy that he and his people want. If it's McCarthy, then draft McCarthy.

I didn't think the Giants would be willing to move on this soon after signing Jones. I'm very happy that it appears I'm wrong on that.
RE:  
David B. : 3/2/2024 2:04 pm : link
Quote:
so
Eric from BBI : Admin : 12:59 pm : link : reply
yet another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.


Take it with salt. Whether you agree or not, Duggan bangs the drum to get rid of Jones every day. Suggesting that the Giants COULD move up in the draft isn't "feeling the urgency," it's a DUH.

We really won't know until the draft is over.
David  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 3/2/2024 2:06 pm : link
he said the Giants ARE exploring the cost of moving up, not maybe.
RE: Some  
Section331 : 3/2/2024 2:09 pm : link
In comment 16414127 Toth029 said:
Quote:
Who keep saying it's desperate but don't explain why.


Because with 2 neck injuries and an injury guarantee, Jones is virtually unplayable this year.
RE: McCarthy is not the guy that I'd pick,  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 2:09 pm : link
In comment 16414226 Go Terps said:
Quote:
but I want Schoen to draft the guy that he and his people want. If it's McCarthy, then draft McCarthy.

I didn't think the Giants would be willing to move on this soon after signing Jones. I'm very happy that it appears I'm wrong on that.


Well it's feeling likely that CW and JD go 1-2, then Maye or McCarthy which will leave us trading up to 4 or 5 for Maye or McCarthy. I'm guessing you would prefer Maye? I would trade as much as it took if Jayden Daniels was available at 3, but if it's Maye I'm not biting.
RE: If Daniel Jones is 100% healthy he is their qb, to pick a qb in  
56goat : 3/2/2024 2:17 pm : link
In comment 16414137 Jack Stroud said:
Quote:
the 1st rd will set the franchise back 5 years. The Giants have so many other areas of need they can not pass up drafting a player who can come in and contribute immediately. Sure, the draft is a crap shoot but not picking a player who you think can play right away is just a bad move.


DJ will never again be 100% healthy, that is the point.
If it comes down to McCarthy,  
Simms11 : 3/2/2024 2:18 pm : link
I’d be ok with it. He’s a winner a nd a very competitive guy. He has some very good traits as a QB. I’d question his arm strength, but that’s not everything. Brady didn’t have elite arm strength but just had an innate ability to play the position. Could McCarthy be cut from a similar mold as another Michigan QB?
RE: David  
56goat : 3/2/2024 2:18 pm : link
In comment 16414233 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
he said the Giants ARE exploring the cost of moving up, not maybe.


Exactly, they should be exploring all options, including moving up and moving down.
RE: RE: Some  
Toth029 : 3/2/2024 2:22 pm : link
In comment 16414237 Section331 said:
Quote:
In comment 16414127 Toth029 said:


Quote:


Who keep saying it's desperate but don't explain why.



Because with 2 neck injuries and an injury guarantee, Jones is virtually unplayable this year.


That can be picking a quarterback in general then, not simply name dropping JJ and saying it's desperate. Why picking him is desperate but picking others is not, for example.

I'm skeptical on all the players, tbh. But if Daboll eyes JJ and they get him, he wanted him because he has a plan for him and his fit in BD's real offense.
RE: RE: RE: RE: McCarthy just measured  
Rjanyg : 3/2/2024 2:31 pm : link
In comment 16414191 BleedBlue46 said:
Quote:
In comment 16414136 Rjanyg said:


Quote:


In comment 16414126 GFAN52 said:


Quote:


In comment 16414094 Dave on the UWS said:


Quote:


over 6-3 and 219 pounds. Not much smaller than Maye. He's going top 8 for sure. NOT a reach at 6. Is he the right "fit" is the big question.



Not over 6'3", he measured 6'2 4/8" and 219 lbs to be exact.



So 6’ 2.5 “



Looks like he has about the same body type as Aaron Rodgers and Matthew Stafford. 6'2.5" is a solid height for a QB. Give him some time in the NFL while DJ holds it down and he will be playing at 225-230lbs 6'2.5", hands are a bit smaller like Joe Burrows but he has played with cold weather in the Midwest his whole football career growing up in Illinois and playing at Michigan. If we can't get Jayden Daniels then I want JJM without trading much more than future picks (future 3rd or 4th and 5th should get it done for the Chargers).


He may be the pick at 6. Based on what Sy says and the general thoughts in NFL reports, he might be worth the 6th pick.
RE: RE: All  
AcidTest : 3/2/2024 2:33 pm : link
In comment 16414225 Sean said:
Quote:
In comment 16414196 AcidTest said:


Quote:


this "smoke" from many beat writers probably means that Giants are in fact strongly trying to move up to #3. That would be a huge mistake IMO, especially since it would cost a lot more than the three second round picks the Jets gave up to move from #6 to #3. I would prefer not to take McCarthy at #6, but could live with doing so.


If the QB is good, no one will care.


The operative word you used is "if." Massive move ups for QBs rarely work. And after giving Jones that ridiculous contract, Schoen frankly hasn't earned the right to spend the amount of draft capital that would be required to trade with NE. He's also made a lot of other poor evaluations both in the draft and FA, including Ezeudu, McKethan, Glowinski, Waller, Campbell, and maybe Neal, who doesn't look even close to being worth the #7 pick. Schmitz and Gray were also underwhelming.
RE: RE: RE: All  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 2:37 pm : link
In comment 16414265 AcidTest said:
Quote:
In comment 16414225 Sean said:


Quote:


In comment 16414196 AcidTest said:


Quote:


this "smoke" from many beat writers probably means that Giants are in fact strongly trying to move up to #3. That would be a huge mistake IMO, especially since it would cost a lot more than the three second round picks the Jets gave up to move from #6 to #3. I would prefer not to take McCarthy at #6, but could live with doing so.


If the QB is good, no one will care.



The operative word you used is "if." Massive move ups for QBs rarely work. And after giving Jones that ridiculous contract, Schoen frankly hasn't earned the right to spend the amount of draft capital that would be required to trade with NE. He's also made a lot of other poor evaluations both in the draft and FA, including Ezeudu, McKethan, Glowinski, Waller, Campbell, and maybe Neal, who doesn't look even close to being worth the #7 pick. Schmitz and Gray were also underwhelming.


I agree, trading up to 3 is not worth it unless it's for Jayden Daniels and I feel like that's a low likelihood at this point.
RE: RE: I would be  
GiantGrit : 3/2/2024 2:39 pm : link
In comment 16414098 Rjanyg said:
Quote:
In comment 16414091 GiantGrit said:


Quote:


Absolutely shocked if the Giants picked McCarthy at 6.



Grit,

Would you be shocked if they took Nix at 6?



As of today, yes. Giants like both of them but I don't know if they would pull the trigger on either that high. the immediate counterpoint, which is valid, would be neither guy is going to be around in the 2nd round with McCarthy seemingly going top 15 now and Nix maybe lasting till 20-30.

I'm mystified as to what the strategy will be.
RE: so  
mphbullet36 : 3/2/2024 2:41 pm : link
In comment 16414095 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
yet another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.


I mean even if they wanted to believe in his talent and I think he had the making to be a really solid QB that could help a team win. How can they trust the health? The neck the knee...I don't think even if you believed in his talent you cant be all in with the injuries especially long term.
RE: so  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 3/2/2024 2:44 pm : link
In comment 16414095 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
yet another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.


So is the entire fanbase.
Forcing JJ McCarthy  
Ned In Atlanta : 3/2/2024 2:44 pm : link
At 6 would be Jones redux. And I want a qb. But I'd much rather trade down, and move back up into the late first than pick McCarthy at 6 or god forbid move up to 4.
RE: RE: RE: I would be  
AcidTest : 3/2/2024 2:45 pm : link
In comment 16414278 GiantGrit said:
Quote:
In comment 16414098 Rjanyg said:


Quote:


In comment 16414091 GiantGrit said:


Quote:


Absolutely shocked if the Giants picked McCarthy at 6.



Grit,

Would you be shocked if they took Nix at 6?




As of today, yes. Giants like both of them but I don't know if they would pull the trigger on either that high. the immediate counterpoint, which is valid, would be neither guy is going to be around in the 2nd round with McCarthy seemingly going top 15 now and Nix maybe lasting till 20-30.

I'm mystified as to what the strategy will be.


If the Giants trade down the won't get McCarthy, but as you note they could very likely still get Nix. And even in a WR-rich draft, somebody might want to trade up to #6 for Nabers or Odunze. If not, then just take whichever one is left, or the one you prefer if they are both still available.
RE: RE: RE: RE: I would be  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 2:48 pm : link
In comment 16414290 AcidTest said:
Quote:
In comment 16414278 GiantGrit said:


Quote:


In comment 16414098 Rjanyg said:


Quote:


In comment 16414091 GiantGrit said:


Quote:


Absolutely shocked if the Giants picked McCarthy at 6.



Grit,

Would you be shocked if they took Nix at 6?




As of today, yes. Giants like both of them but I don't know if they would pull the trigger on either that high. the immediate counterpoint, which is valid, would be neither guy is going to be around in the 2nd round with McCarthy seemingly going top 15 now and Nix maybe lasting till 20-30.

I'm mystified as to what the strategy will be.



If the Giants trade down the won't get McCarthy, but as you note they could very likely still get Nix. And even in a WR-rich draft, somebody might want to trade up to #6 for Nabers or Odunze. If not, then just take whichever one is left, or the one you prefer if they are both still available.


Trading down for Nix would be awful imo he isn't anywhere close to the level of the top 4 and I'd prefer Pennix to him myself.
Eric  
David B. : 3/2/2024 2:49 pm : link
Quote:

Eric from BBI : Admin : 2:06 pm : link : reply
he said the Giants ARE exploring the cost of moving up, not maybe.


Of course they are. Why wouldn't they? Isn't that just due diligence? Schoen said he'd be talking to the other GMs at the combine (about whether they'd be receptive). If he says it publicly in his presser, it's not some big, inside scoop from a biased (in this area) beat writer.

Look, maybe they trade up, or maybe they feel price is too high for them. I don't know. But to me, it seems quite a leap from exploring the possibility to being done with Jones.

My take is this: IF they go all in and trade up, that's a clear indicator Jones is out after next season. Same is true in the unlikely event one of the top 3 QBs falls to them at 6 and they take him. If they don't trade up, Jones is their QB until they find another one.

What they do in the draft will be the ONLY PUBLIC indication of how they really feel about Jones.

Anything before that is speculation, and wishful thinking.

ALSO, everyone's just assuming that the Giants LOVE all 3 QBs. What if they don't? We've ALL watched drafts were a fan-consensus guy was sitting there and they took someone else.

What if one of the top 3 QBs falls in their lap at 6 and the Giants take a WR? Sure, BBI will shit its cage, but what does THAT say? About Jones or anything else?

I don't claim to know how they feel or what they want to do at 6. I don't think anyone does. But right now, much of the media is writing DUH type articles under the assumption that the Giants absolutely MUST trade up and get a new QB. I don't believe the Giants are operating under that premise. It's just one option.

RE: Forcing JJ McCarthy  
GiantGrit : 3/2/2024 2:51 pm : link
In comment 16414288 Ned In Atlanta said:
Quote:
At 6 would be Jones redux. And I want a qb. But I'd much rather trade down, and move back up into the late first than pick McCarthy at 6 or god forbid move up to 4.


Ned, it sounds great on paper and if they knew Nix/McCarthy would be there back end of round 1 I'm sure they would sign up for this. But how realistic is that?

Hard to swallow pill for everyone, including the Giants, is if they are really that fixated on taking a top 5 QB it will need to be at 6.

They have enough holes that you're strategy also makes sense but they absolutely cannot rely solely on Jones at QB.

The Giants, and really this regime in particular are in a very disadvantageous position imo
RE: RE: RE: McCarthy = Desperation  
jvm52106 : 3/2/2024 2:52 pm : link
In comment 16414188 jeff57 said:
Quote:
In comment 16414172 jvm52106 said:


Quote:


In comment 16414081 jeff57 said:


Quote:


Reach for a QB at your peril.



Why, because you feel that way?



That’s my opinion.


Interesting since your opinion implies you have QB rankings that are different (ie McCarthy ) isn't worth a top 6 pick..

If the Giants like McCarthy then go for it! They have scouted ALL of the top touted QB prospects thos year..

I'm not saying JJ would be the wrong pick at 6  
mphbullet36 : 3/2/2024 2:53 pm : link
If they believe he's a franchise QB then fine...but not because they think he a competent QB. They need to believe he can be a top 5 top 10 QB to be worthy of that pick.

Its just going to be a tough sell on the franchise...we really want a QB but we probably are getting the 4th QB out of the top 6 picks. I mean maybe this is a generational QB class...but if its not this regime will be out of here really quick. Especially when there are big time non-qb prospects that will just fall into our lap at 6.
RE: RE: RE: RE: McCarthy = Desperation  
mphbullet36 : 3/2/2024 2:55 pm : link
In comment 16414302 jvm52106 said:
Quote:
In comment 16414188 jeff57 said:


Quote:


In comment 16414172 jvm52106 said:


Quote:


In comment 16414081 jeff57 said:


Quote:


Reach for a QB at your peril.



Why, because you feel that way?



That’s my opinion.



Interesting since your opinion implies you have QB rankings that are different (ie McCarthy ) isn't worth a top 6 pick..

If the Giants like McCarthy then go for it! They have scouted ALL of the top touted QB prospects thos year..


they can't just like him they have to love him...otherwise that does kind reek of a little desperation...you want a QB that bad and like the kid so you basically are left with the 4th QB selected in the draft within the top 6.

They better think the kid is a franchise changing QB...not a good system game managing QB.
RE: I'm not saying JJ would be the wrong pick at 6  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 2:57 pm : link
In comment 16414303 mphbullet36 said:
Quote:
If they believe he's a franchise QB then fine...but not because they think he a competent QB. They need to believe he can be a top 5 top 10 QB to be worthy of that pick.

Its just going to be a tough sell on the franchise...we really want a QB but we probably are getting the 4th QB out of the top 6 picks. I mean maybe this is a generational QB class...but if its not this regime will be out of here really quick. Especially when there are big time non-qb prospects that will just fall into our lap at 6.


There are plenty of examples Of quarterbacks taken after the top three being Great NFL quarterbacks. Just in recent years Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson and Jalen Hurts come to mind.
I'm REALLY interested to see  
Dave on the UWS : 3/2/2024 3:03 pm : link
JJ and Nix throw the whole route tree.
I can see Arizona moving from 4 to 6 IF they feel Nabors (or Odunze) are pretty close to MHJ. They could get a blue chip WR and a nice package from NY. They would definitely consider it.
There will ABSOLUTELY be a price that will get them to move.
Its "will JS pay it".
This is a watershed moment for the franchise. Even if the guy they pick busts, they break the sequence of Eli and Eli 2.0. that they've been stuck in since around 2016.

No one knows which of these guys is THE guy. You can make a case for any of these QBs. Identify YOUR guy and go and get him.
AND Rappaport just reported  
Dave on the UWS : 3/2/2024 3:05 pm : link
Pennix"s medicals came out "extremely positive".
6 QBs are going in rd 1. If you want a QB, THIS is the draft to get one!
I'm not saying take JJ McCarthy at 6  
Ben in Tampa : 3/2/2024 3:05 pm : link
but I am saying if you think he's going to be on the board in the mid 1st round you're nuts.

Falcons at 8, Vikings at 11, Broncos at 12, Raiders at 13. All of those teams would draft him and all of them are probably trying to figure out how to get in front of each other to draft him.
Some of you are in absolute and complete denial right now  
HardTruth : 3/2/2024 3:06 pm : link
1- Jones has a 5 year of putting it charitably not getting the desired results. We are a bottom 3 team in NFL for his career here and we have not made it out of October for 4 out of 5 seasons

2- Jones now has an injury history in his neck and knee which are two important spots for a running QB. This has led to 2 season ending injuries in 2 out of last 3 years.

3- Schoen has openly acknowledged Giants need to add a QB, will look to draft for a QBand that has mentioned both Jones injuries and the possibility of trading up in virtually every single public interview/presser.

4- the Giants reporters including the ones most closely connected with team directives (Paul Schwartz) have all written articles on Giants looking to not only draft a QB but potentially trading up.

5- national reporters at the Combine are discussing how they are hearing at the Combine and reporting that the Giants are mentioned in every conversation about trading up.

6- we have asshat rumors on top of that coming out that the Giants are in fact looking to draft QB and maybe trade up.

The Giants may not draft QB at 6 but you really need your head in the sand to not be taking this very seriously that Giants think they need a QB and considering even trading up for one.

All of the above smells of a team preparing its fan base for drafting a QB and moving on from the incumbent QB.
RE: I'm REALLY interested to see  
HardTruth : 3/2/2024 3:08 pm : link
In comment 16414315 Dave on the UWS said:
Quote:
JJ and Nix throw the whole route tree.
I can see Arizona moving from 4 to 6 IF they feel Nabors (or Odunze) are pretty close to MHJ. They could get a blue chip WR and a nice package from NY. They would definitely consider it.
There will ABSOLUTELY be a price that will get them to move.
Its "will JS pay it".
This is a watershed moment for the franchise. Even if the guy they pick busts, they break the sequence of Eli and Eli 2.0. that they've been stuck in since around 2016.

No one knows which of these guys is THE guy. You can make a case for any of these QBs. Identify YOUR guy and go and get him.


Maye to me seems like Eli 3.0
Unless they think someone might jump them for JJ  
The_Boss : 3/2/2024 3:17 pm : link
I’d stay at 6. They have no shot at Williams or Maye.

(if JJ is the target)
RE: Unless they think someone might jump them for JJ  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 3:22 pm : link
In comment 16414330 The_Boss said:
Quote:
I’d stay at 6. They have no shot at Williams or Maye.

(if JJ is the target)


I think Jayden Daniels go 1-2 then Maye could be had with trade up to 3 and JJ could be had from 4-6.
The doublethink around QBs is amusing  
Scooter185 : 3/2/2024 3:30 pm : link
"Giants shouldn't settle for qb4"
"Sometimes qb3/4/etc is the best one in the draft!"

As long as it's a QB BD feels comfortable with take him
RE: Some of you are in absolute and complete denial right now  
jeff57 : 3/2/2024 3:34 pm : link
In comment 16414321 HardTruth said:
Quote:
1- Jones has a 5 year of putting it charitably not getting the desired results. We are a bottom 3 team in NFL for his career here and we have not made it out of October for 4 out of 5 seasons

2- Jones now has an injury history in his neck and knee which are two important spots for a running QB. This has led to 2 season ending injuries in 2 out of last 3 years.

3- Schoen has openly acknowledged Giants need to add a QB, will look to draft for a QBand that has mentioned both Jones injuries and the possibility of trading up in virtually every single public interview/presser.

4- the Giants reporters including the ones most closely connected with team directives (Paul Schwartz) have all written articles on Giants looking to not only draft a QB but potentially trading up.

5- national reporters at the Combine are discussing how they are hearing at the Combine and reporting that the Giants are mentioned in every conversation about trading up.

6- we have asshat rumors on top of that coming out that the Giants are in fact looking to draft QB and maybe trade up.

The Giants may not draft QB at 6 but you really need your head in the sand to not be taking this very seriously that Giants think they need a QB and considering even trading up for one.

All of the above smells of a team preparing its fan base for drafting a QB and moving on from the incumbent QB.


I’m not arguing with that. But it has to be the right QB.
RE: ... another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.  
Trainmaster : 3/2/2024 3:34 pm : link
At a minimum, Schoen's and Daball's jobs (particularly Daboll's) are potentially on the line for the 2024. IMHO, they absolutely cannot rely on Daniel Jones to be the starter for the full year, given his multiple serious injuries.

The roster still has many holes. Trading up from sixth overall will consume even more 2024 and 2025 picks. leaving more holes to be addressed. My guess is the highest they consider moving up is to NE at third overall (cost the Jets three second rounders in 2018 I believe). Arizona and San Diego are potential trade up partners as well.

With no reasonable trade up offers and assuming the top 3 or even top 4 picks are gone, the choices are: 1) Stay put and pick the next QB off the board (likely overdrafting the 5th best or even 4th best QB), 2) taking the BPA non-QB and maybe trading back into the bottom of the first round for a QB or 3) trading back from sixth overall and taking a QB with their first rounder or waiting until the second round.
RE: RE: ... another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 3:37 pm : link
In comment 16414353 Trainmaster said:
Quote:
At a minimum, Schoen's and Daball's jobs (particularly Daboll's) are potentially on the line for the 2024. IMHO, they absolutely cannot rely on Daniel Jones to be the starter for the full year, given his multiple serious injuries.

The roster still has many holes. Trading up from sixth overall will consume even more 2024 and 2025 picks. leaving more holes to be addressed. My guess is the highest they consider moving up is to NE at third overall (cost the Jets three second rounders in 2018 I believe). Arizona and San Diego are potential trade up partners as well.

With no reasonable trade up offers and assuming the top 3 or even top 4 picks are gone, the choices are: 1) Stay put and pick the next QB off the board (likely overdrafting the 5th best or even 4th best QB), 2) taking the BPA non-QB and maybe trading back into the bottom of the first round for a QB or 3) trading back from sixth overall and taking a QB with their first rounder or waiting until the second round.


If they like DM or JJM then we won't lose the bidding war to trade up to 6. No one but us can guarantee AZ or LA a blue chipper while trading down. We won't let someone jump us for one of the top 4 if we want him.
Shea Tierney with McCarthy  
Sean : 3/2/2024 3:37 pm : link
.
Link - ( New Window )
Just read odds on JJM to NYG  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 3:43 pm : link
Just jumped from 1600 to 1000.
RE: If Daniel Jones is 100% healthy he is their qb, to pick a qb in  
bwitz : 3/2/2024 3:50 pm : link
In comment 16414137 Jack Stroud said:
Quote:
the 1st rd will set the franchise back 5 years. The Giants have so many other areas of need they can not pass up drafting a player who can come in and contribute immediately. Sure, the draft is a crap shoot but not picking a player who you think can play right away is just a bad move.


Wrong.
RE: Shea Tierney with McCarthy  
Lambuth_Special : 3/2/2024 3:50 pm : link
In comment 16414360 Sean said:
Quote:
. Link - ( New Window )


If one didn’t know better, you could say that looks like full bloom…ah, nevermind.
A very good QB  
Lambuth_Special : 3/2/2024 3:52 pm : link
Will make a lot of holes in the roster disappear.
So here is the potential scenarios  
Rjanyg : 3/2/2024 4:08 pm : link
Williams and Daniels go 1-2
1. Maye is available and NE takes him. AZ takes MHJ. Charger willing to move back and Giants trade the 3rd round pick for McCarthy.

2. Maybe the Pats like McCarthy so they trade pick 39 and 2025 1st round pick to NYG. Giants take Maye. Or Pats take McCarthy and Giants trade to 5 and get Maye.

3. One of Maye or McCarthy falls to NYG and we keep all our draft picks.
RE: RE: Some of you are in absolute and complete denial right now  
HardTruth : 3/2/2024 4:10 pm : link
In comment 16414352 jeff57 said:
Quote:
In comment 16414321 HardTruth said:


Quote:


1- Jones has a 5 year of putting it charitably not getting the desired results. We are a bottom 3 team in NFL for his career here and we have not made it out of October for 4 out of 5 seasons

2- Jones now has an injury history in his neck and knee which are two important spots for a running QB. This has led to 2 season ending injuries in 2 out of last 3 years.

3- Schoen has openly acknowledged Giants need to add a QB, will look to draft for a QBand that has mentioned both Jones injuries and the possibility of trading up in virtually every single public interview/presser.

4- the Giants reporters including the ones most closely connected with team directives (Paul Schwartz) have all written articles on Giants looking to not only draft a QB but potentially trading up.

5- national reporters at the Combine are discussing how they are hearing at the Combine and reporting that the Giants are mentioned in every conversation about trading up.

6- we have asshat rumors on top of that coming out that the Giants are in fact looking to draft QB and maybe trade up.

The Giants may not draft QB at 6 but you really need your head in the sand to not be taking this very seriously that Giants think they need a QB and considering even trading up for one.

All of the above smells of a team preparing its fan base for drafting a QB and moving on from the incumbent QB.



I’m not arguing with that. But it has to be the right QB.



Sure. But shouldn’t it be true for any position? Is it good to draft the wrong WR?

There seems to be a presumption that all these WRs will hit but only QBs can bust

Its simply not true. Did it help us that Neal or Flowers or Apple were not QBs?

The idea that a QB is 5 years and is outdated only if you let it. SF just made a SB within 5 years of a bust QB. The Eagles drafted Wentz, won a SB with Foles and then made a SB with Hurts all within 7 years. The Rams drafted Goff and made a SB and then traded him and made a SB with Stafford within 6 years. The Bucs drafted Winston and won a SB with Brady within 6 years.

QB is only 5 years if you make excuses and deny all results and stubbornly stick to mistakes to prove you are right
RE: So here is the potential scenarios  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 4:11 pm : link
In comment 16414390 Rjanyg said:
Quote:
Williams and Daniels go 1-2
1. Maye is available and NE takes him. AZ takes MHJ. Charger willing to move back and Giants trade the 3rd round pick for McCarthy.

2. Maybe the Pats like McCarthy so they trade pick 39 and 2025 1st round pick to NYG. Giants take Maye. Or Pats take McCarthy and Giants trade to 5 and get Maye.

3. One of Maye or McCarthy falls to NYG and we keep all our draft picks.


Very likely, wildcard being if AZ has MHJ and Nabers/Odunze graded very closely and we trade up to 4 for JJM or Maye. Either way you cut it, we are primed to get one of the top 4 QBs if we want to which all signs seem to point toward us wanting to based on insider info and reports.
At this point i would draft  
kelly : 3/2/2024 4:27 pm : link
Two quarterbacks.

Its a total crap shoot and you need a back up.

How about JJM and Pratt.
RE: At this point i would draft  
GFAN52 : 3/2/2024 4:31 pm : link
In comment 16414406 kelly said:
Quote:
Two quarterbacks.

Its a total crap shoot and you need a back up.

How about JJM and Pratt.


NO!
RE: A very good QB  
Scooter185 : 3/2/2024 4:32 pm : link
In comment 16414381 Lambuth_Special said:
Quote:
Will make a lot of holes in the roster disappear.


+10000
RE: RE: Duggan  
BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit : 3/2/2024 4:47 pm : link
In comment 16414159 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
In comment 16414145 BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit said:


Quote:


May be the most dialed in of the beats.

It's either old times again at the meadowlands with loose lips OR it is intentional smoke.

Based on this regime being pretty tight on info so far I'd say most likely smoke.






Not sure how the Giants making other teams think they want a QB helps them. The non-QBs will be there.


Something just feels off. This isn't smoke it's a raging inferno. Every single beat it on it and even non-locals are on it. I can't imagine the Giants brass being that obvious about it.
Odd how pronounced their intentions are. They need to dial it down  
nygiantfan : 3/2/2024 5:01 pm : link
a bit as not everybody needs to know their business. Otherwise strike a deal and get out of there.
RE: RE: RE: Duggan  
Blue The Dog : 3/2/2024 5:19 pm : link
In comment 16414425 BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit said:
Quote:
In comment 16414159 Eric from BBI said:


Quote:


In comment 16414145 BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit said:


Quote:


May be the most dialed in of the beats.

It's either old times again at the meadowlands with loose lips OR it is intentional smoke.

Based on this regime being pretty tight on info so far I'd say most likely smoke.






Not sure how the Giants making other teams think they want a QB helps them. The non-QBs will be there.



Something just feels off. This isn't smoke it's a raging inferno. Every single beat it on it and even non-locals are on it. I can't imagine the Giants brass being that obvious about it.


It's harder to keep your intentions secret when you are actively trying to move up. If you are trying to move up, by definition you have to be talking to other teams, so it opens up the amount of people who know your plans. If the giants have put in calls to all of the top 5 about what it would take to move up, there are now 5 front offices who know the Giants overall plan and have no incentive to keep it a secret
RE: McCarthy is not the guy that I'd pick,  
Joey in VA : 3/2/2024 5:23 pm : link
In comment 16414226 Go Terps said:
Quote:
but I want Schoen to draft the guy that he and his people want. If it's McCarthy, then draft McCarthy.

I didn't think the Giants would be willing to move on this soon after signing Jones. I'm very happy that it appears I'm wrong on that.
I told you so! The trade of Leonard Williams was the signal for me, the team had not mailed it in at all, and losing your rock on the DL for a 2nd means he needs ammo for a QB.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Duggan  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 5:24 pm : link
In comment 16414474 Blue The Dog said:
Quote:
In comment 16414425 BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit said:


Quote:


In comment 16414159 Eric from BBI said:


Quote:


In comment 16414145 BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit said:


Quote:


May be the most dialed in of the beats.

It's either old times again at the meadowlands with loose lips OR it is intentional smoke.

Based on this regime being pretty tight on info so far I'd say most likely smoke.






Not sure how the Giants making other teams think they want a QB helps them. The non-QBs will be there.



Something just feels off. This isn't smoke it's a raging inferno. Every single beat it on it and even non-locals are on it. I can't imagine the Giants brass being that obvious about it.



It's harder to keep your intentions secret when you are actively trying to move up. If you are trying to move up, by definition you have to be talking to other teams, so it opens up the amount of people who know your plans. If the giants have put in calls to all of the top 5 about what it would take to move up, there are now 5 front offices who know the Giants overall plan and have no incentive to keep it a secret


Plus, Schoen knows we hold all the cards for a trade up. No other team can offer a trade package that would include getting a blue chip player in the draft. So if Schoen really wants one of the top 4 QBs then he doesn't care if reports leak about them wanting to tradeup. No team behind us can Make an offer like we can.
RE: so  
Fishmanjim57 : 3/2/2024 5:45 pm : link
In comment 16414095 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
yet another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.


Thank goodness!
RE: David  
Mayo2JZ : 3/2/2024 5:54 pm : link
In comment 16414233 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
he said the Giants ARE exploring the cost of moving up, not maybe.


Stay at 6 and get the BPA. Take Rattler in the 2nd. He’s going to be a star
RE: Desperate isn't the right word  
Mayo2JZ : 3/2/2024 6:03 pm : link
In comment 16414173 bceagle05 said:
Quote:
but if they're aggressively trying to trade up (as has been reported) and fail to do so, taking McCarthy at six would seem like settling. I think that's the issue people would have with it, and it's a legit concern.


And how do you know that this isn’t their plan all along? Just a few days ago everyone was hoping to get JJ but now it’s viewed as a desperation pick? Please
RE: RE: David  
Strahan91 : 3/2/2024 6:23 pm : link
In comment 16414508 Mayo2JZ said:
Quote:
In comment 16414233 Eric from BBI said:


Quote:


he said the Giants ARE exploring the cost of moving up, not maybe.



Stay at 6 and get the BPA. Take Rattler in the 2nd. He’s going to be a star

Link - ( New Window )
RE: Eric  
Mayo2JZ : 3/2/2024 6:23 pm : link
In comment 16414296 David B. said:
Quote:


Quote:



Eric from BBI : Admin : 2:06 pm : link : reply
he said the Giants ARE exploring the cost of moving up, not maybe.



Of course they are. Why wouldn't they? Isn't that just due diligence? Schoen said he'd be talking to the other GMs at the combine (about whether they'd be receptive). If he says it publicly in his presser, it's not some big, inside scoop from a biased (in this area) beat writer.

Look, maybe they trade up, or maybe they feel price is too high for them. I don't know. But to me, it seems quite a leap from exploring the possibility to being done with Jones.

My take is this: IF they go all in and trade up, that's a clear indicator Jones is out after next season. Same is true in the unlikely event one of the top 3 QBs falls to them at 6 and they take him. If they don't trade up, Jones is their QB until they find another one.

What they do in the draft will be the ONLY PUBLIC indication of how they really feel about Jones.

Anything before that is speculation, and wishful thinking.

ALSO, everyone's just assuming that the Giants LOVE all 3 QBs. What if they don't? We've ALL watched drafts were a fan-consensus guy was sitting there and they took someone else.

What if one of the top 3 QBs falls in their lap at 6 and the Giants take a WR? Sure, BBI will shit its cage, but what does THAT say? About Jones or anything else?

I don't claim to know how they feel or what they want to do at 6. I don't think anyone does. But right now, much of the media is writing DUH type articles under the assumption that the Giants absolutely MUST trade up and get a new QB. I don't believe the Giants are operating under that premise. It's just one option.


THIS!!!
RE: RE: Desperate isn't the right word  
bceagle05 : 3/2/2024 6:25 pm : link
In comment 16414522 Mayo2JZ said:
Quote:
In comment 16414173 bceagle05 said:


Quote:


but if they're aggressively trying to trade up (as has been reported) and fail to do so, taking McCarthy at six would seem like settling. I think that's the issue people would have with it, and it's a legit concern.



And how do you know that this isn’t their plan all along? Just a few days ago everyone was hoping to get JJ but now it’s viewed as a desperation pick? Please

I literally said desperate isn’t the right word.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Duggan  
BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit : 3/2/2024 6:30 pm : link
In comment 16414474 Blue The Dog said:
Quote:
In comment 16414425 BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit said:


Quote:


In comment 16414159 Eric from BBI said:


Quote:


In comment 16414145 BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit said:


Quote:


May be the most dialed in of the beats.

It's either old times again at the meadowlands with loose lips OR it is intentional smoke.

Based on this regime being pretty tight on info so far I'd say most likely smoke.






Not sure how the Giants making other teams think they want a QB helps them. The non-QBs will be there.



Something just feels off. This isn't smoke it's a raging inferno. Every single beat it on it and even non-locals are on it. I can't imagine the Giants brass being that obvious about it.



It's harder to keep your intentions secret when you are actively trying to move up. If you are trying to move up, by definition you have to be talking to other teams, so it opens up the amount of people who know your plans. If the giants have put in calls to all of the top 5 about what it would take to move up, there are now 5 front offices who know the Giants overall plan and have no incentive to keep it a secret


Good Point.

I suppose our best case scenario is that our brass is doing their due diligence on all scenarios and setting up all options depending on how things move in the next few weeks.

We all have PTSD from when the Giants seemed to get caught flat footed a a few times (Eli Apple year, Devonta Smith jump, barkley not answering calls, etc.)

To his credit Shoen does seem to be very prepared for all scenarios. It's amazing that we as giants fans need to applaud that but here we are.
RE: RE: ... another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.  
Mayo2JZ : 3/2/2024 6:33 pm : link
In comment 16414353 Trainmaster said:
Quote:
At a minimum, Schoen's and Daball's jobs (particularly Daboll's) are potentially on the line for the 2024. IMHO, they absolutely cannot rely on Daniel Jones to be the starter for the full year, given his multiple serious injuries.

The roster still has many holes. Trading up from sixth overall will consume even more 2024 and 2025 picks. leaving more holes to be addressed. My guess is the highest they consider moving up is to NE at third overall (cost the Jets three second rounders in 2018 I believe). Arizona and San Diego are potential trade up partners as well.

With no reasonable trade up offers and assuming the top 3 or even top 4 picks are gone, the choices are: 1) Stay put and pick the next QB off the board (likely overdrafting the 5th best or even 4th best QB), 2) taking the BPA non-QB and maybe trading back into the bottom of the first round for a QB or 3) trading back from sixth overall and taking a QB with their first rounder or waiting until the second round.


Are we still celebrating that Eagles win? That certainly did a lot for the franchise, huh?
RE: At this point i would draft  
Mayo2JZ : 3/2/2024 6:39 pm : link
In comment 16414406 kelly said:
Quote:
Two quarterbacks.

Its a total crap shoot and you need a back up.

How about JJM and Pratt.


Gotta love Rattler
RE: McCarthy is not the guy that I'd pick,  
section125 : 3/2/2024 6:43 pm : link
In comment 16414226 Go Terps said:
Quote:
but I want Schoen to draft the guy that he and his people want. If it's McCarthy, then draft McCarthy.

I didn't think the Giants would be willing to move on this soon after signing Jones. I'm very happy that it appears I'm wrong on that.


Terps, don't mortgage the farm, yet. I'll believe it when I see it...
RE: RE: At this point i would draft  
section125 : 3/2/2024 7:02 pm : link
In comment 16414582 Mayo2JZ said:
Quote:
In comment 16414406 kelly said:


Quote:


Two quarterbacks.

Its a total crap shoot and you need a back up.

How about JJM and Pratt.



Gotta love Rattler


Why? What has he done to deserve this love?
RE: RE: RE: ... another report saying the Giants are done with Jones.  
BleedBlue46 : 3/2/2024 9:03 pm : link
In comment 16414572 Mayo2JZ said:
Quote:
In comment 16414353 Trainmaster said:


Quote:


At a minimum, Schoen's and Daball's jobs (particularly Daboll's) are potentially on the line for the 2024. IMHO, they absolutely cannot rely on Daniel Jones to be the starter for the full year, given his multiple serious injuries.

The roster still has many holes. Trading up from sixth overall will consume even more 2024 and 2025 picks. leaving more holes to be addressed. My guess is the highest they consider moving up is to NE at third overall (cost the Jets three second rounders in 2018 I believe). Arizona and San Diego are potential trade up partners as well.

With no reasonable trade up offers and assuming the top 3 or even top 4 picks are gone, the choices are: 1) Stay put and pick the next QB off the board (likely overdrafting the 5th best or even 4th best QB), 2) taking the BPA non-QB and maybe trading back into the bottom of the first round for a QB or 3) trading back from sixth overall and taking a QB with their first rounder or waiting until the second round.



Are we still celebrating that Eagles win? That certainly did a lot for the franchise, huh?


I personally loved that win and thought it was worth dropping from 5 to 6 to kick the Eagles ass as they headed into the playoffs.
Don't you think it's a little strange for all this to be getting out  
Ten Ton Hammer : 3/2/2024 9:41 pm : link
*seven weeks* ahead of the draft?

Why are you sitting on the edges of your seats and taking every bit of content as legit news? It's okay to be skeptical.
RE: Don't you think it's a little strange for all this to be getting out  
UberAlias : 3/2/2024 9:48 pm : link
In comment 16414744 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
*seven weeks* ahead of the draft?

Why are you sitting on the edges of your seats and taking every bit of content as legit news? It's okay to be skeptical.
When everyone is together in Indianapolis is one of the biggest networking events of the post season. Beat guys stalk hotel bars trying to find scouts and front office guys to pry info from. Doesn't mean it's all legit, but this is prime time for draft info aside from couple days before.
Why QB is a bad idea  
Rudy5757 : 3/3/2024 2:23 pm : link
Was Eli a bad QB the last 6-7 years of his career? No, the talent around him had disappeared to the point he couldn’t get the team to be successful. Plug in Jones, he has a promising rookie year and the talent around him is bottom of the league and he fails, then in 22 things get a little better talent wise and Jones has better success only to have the talent fall back down with injuries and poor talent and again he falls.

Now we want to move up in the draft, lose draft capital and plug a new QB into a poor situation. It’s a plan that fails around the league over and over.

Look at the successful QBs around the league. The majority were plugged in to good situations where they had talent around them and were able to achieve success. Rodgers sat for a few years and became a HOFer, Mahomes sat for a year is well on his way, Purdy looks good in SF on a great team, Dak as a 4th rounder, has been behind the best OL and looks like a good enough QB, Romo before him as an undrafted FA QB, Joe Burrow in Cin was also put into a great situation and even Stroud was put into a good situation.

Then you have Young down in Carolina, Wilson in NY and the countless failures at QB when a team has no talent to support them.

Drafting a QB into the Giants situation and thinking they are going to be successful is just repeating history. We are middle of the road in cap space with very little skill talent and almost no skill talent available in FA. The worst OL in the league. If we trade up, we give away prime draft capital and set up the new QB for failure yet again. Maybe they can fix the OL in FA but they still have no RB, no reliable TE and terrible WRs. It only makes sense to get a QB if the guy falls to them. If not let the QB guru work on a guy they draft in the later rounds. Half the leagues starting QBs are not 1st rounders, so why can’t the Giants groom one?
Rudy- its no longer whether Jones can play or not  
Dave on the UWS : 3/3/2024 3:14 pm : link
His injury history NOW makes it insane to continue with him.
His next neck injury (the two make it HIGHLY likely), "might" leave him paralyzed. He has a 23 million injury guarantee.
Come on, its time to move on.
.  
Tim in Eternal Blue : 3/3/2024 4:13 pm : link
There’s debate about his worthiness for the sixth pick, but the expectation is that a quarterback who had a 27-1 record as a starter at Michigan will win over teams during the pre-draft process.

What a terrible fucking quote. Ken Dorsey was 38-2 with a Natty too. I’m sure he interviewed incredibly well. Doesn’t make him a top 6 pick.
RE: Why QB is a bad idea  
Strahan91 : 3/3/2024 5:30 pm : link
In comment 16415186 Rudy5757 said:
Quote:
Joe Burrow in Cin was also put into a great situation and even Stroud was put into a good situation.

I stopped reading after this part. If you think that's true then you have no idea what you're talking about. Both were far worse situations than the Giants are in now.
RE: Can’t see the Pats giving up on both  
Optimus-NY : 3/3/2024 6:25 pm : link
In comment 16414206 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
QB and Harrison. Cardinals and Chargers could work.


If they don't sign Baker, then yeah.
RE: RE: Can’t see the Pats giving up on both  
GFAN52 : 3/3/2024 6:28 pm : link
In comment 16415397 Optimus-NY said:
Quote:
In comment 16414206 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


QB and Harrison. Cardinals and Chargers could work.



If they don't sign Baker, then yeah.


NE has been rumored to sign Baker AND still draft a QB of the future. Baker would be mentoring their pick is the plan that was rumored.
RE: RE: RE: Can’t see the Pats giving up on both  
Strahan91 : 3/3/2024 6:40 pm : link
In comment 16415402 GFAN52 said:
Quote:
In comment 16415397 Optimus-NY said:


Quote:


In comment 16414206 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


QB and Harrison. Cardinals and Chargers could work.



If they don't sign Baker, then yeah.



NE has been rumored to sign Baker AND still draft a QB of the future. Baker would be mentoring their pick is the plan that was rumored.

I doubt Baker would sign up to be a lame duck QB with what seems to be a pretty good market for him
It would be nice if Mara didn't have to get so  
prematurely_blue : 3/3/2024 7:01 pm : link
embarrassed by your letter Strahan91 that he decided it wouldn't be a good idea to roll it back with Jones.

It would have been nice if he could actually make the talent assessment instead of his normal decision making process of going with his personal feelings until there are enough pitchforks outside the meadowlands. At least he is consistent!
RE: RE: Why QB is a bad idea  
Rudy5757 : 3/3/2024 9:47 pm : link
In comment 16415343 Strahan91 said:
Quote:
In comment 16415186 Rudy5757 said:


Quote:


Joe Burrow in Cin was also put into a great situation and even Stroud was put into a good situation.


I stopped reading after this part. If you think that's true then you have no idea what you're talking about. Both were far worse situations than the Giants are in now.


So Cincy getting the 1st overall QB without having to trade away anything and Tee Higgins in the 2nd with Mixon on the team and then getting the best WR in the 1st the following year in Chase is a worse situation than the Giants?

We most likely have to trade up to get the 3rd or 4th best QB in the draft and at what price? Maybe our 1st next year.

The biggest issue with trading up to take a QB is where are you going to get players to improve the team? We are middle of the road in cap space with a ton of needs and no real playmakers. No RB, No TE and No WRs. FA money dries up quick the way the Giants operate. Tag Barkley and $12 Mil is gone. Sit tight and get a QB if one that you like falls to 6. Dont get desperate and trade away a boatload of resources, just take a WR. There are QBs worth taking later on that Daboll can work with especially since the QB drafted ealry may not even start year 1 anyway. Complete mistake trading up.
Back to the Corner