Will require 2025 #1. To get to 4, all about outbidding Minn who would offer two 2024 #1’s but AZ would miss out on the top 3 wr’s. AZ is our best option to secure a QB ( most likely JJ) without giving up next years #1- in my humble opinion.
the competition to move up. Move to 2-3 you not only have to make it worthwhile for the trading team, but you’re bidding against the Vikes as well. It will likely take at least 6, 47 and a future first to get in on the conversation. Move up to 4 not happening for less than 6 and 47.
Washington is purportedly all in for Daniels. And as if they would trade with a division rival to set them up for a potential career starter at QB who would be a pain in the ass to play against twice a year, every year?
of trading #6 vs something like #11 is not to be ignored. There is a chance NE or ARI has a player they covet and can get at 6....not so with 11+. There is real value in that.
of trading #6 vs something like #11 is not to be ignored. There is a chance NE or ARI has a player they covet and can get at 6....not so with 11+. There is real value in that.
Agreed. It cannot be ignored. But it’s also not an overwhelming advantage. Not when the teams at 7 and 8 have declared themselves open for business, and a team trading down for 11 and 23 and whatever else could likely trade back up for 11 and a #2. They likely still get their guy, and come out ahead.
#70
2025 1st
Or
#6
#47
2025 2nd
2026 2nd/3rd
Looking back on it, that trade from the Vikings wasn't bad. Pick 41 and 2025 2nd for pick 23?
Number 47 and 70 could presumably get them into the end of round one.
Agreed. It cannot be ignored. But it’s also not an overwhelming advantage. Not when the teams at 7 and 8 have declared themselves open for business, and a team trading down for 11 and 23 and whatever else could likely trade back up for 11 and a #2. They likely still get their guy, and come out ahead.