for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Dust has cleared

Thegratefulhead : 5/13/2024 11:07 am
If you remove emotion and attachments to your predictions or desires and look at it with unbiased eyes, it is hard to conclude we have not gotten better. I am also encouraged by the actions of the GM and head coach, enough so, that I feel that we have the right people in place.

Schoen did a great job negotiating the Jones contract.

Line in the sand for many and it shows how far apart we can be in thinking. To me, Jones had the leverage in negotiations, he had just won a playoff game away and had led an untalented team to the playoffs. Also, financially we could have drafted a QB in rd 1, the contract was not an obstacle in 2024 and definitely not long term. Proof to me, that it was a good contract for the team in the scenario they were in. If Schoen had let Jones go and 2023 happened I think he is fired at season’s end.

It doesn’t matter who was at QB in 2023, in my opinion the season would have played out the same way. Look awful early and better when the OL got healthy and started to gel. I looked deeply at the all-22 of the first 5 games. Neal wasn’t even injured at all and it was like his off season training messed him up, he looked confused.

The way this team handled the draft.

Admit they had us running in circles.

Clueless, all of us, including the media.

Well executed.

Burns, wow.

The way Daboll has handled the situations with his staff leads me to believe we have an actual alpha at the helm. Season was going to shit, took over play calling, made zero issue of it but wanted all the responsibility. Wink was undermining his authority and Daboll went gansta.

Shurmur and Judge were pretending. Judge was a wacka doo, in technical terms. What happened under Judge doesn’t count in my mind, they ran a 90s offense.

I wanted McCarthy at 6 but I understand I don’t have the critical information to truly question these decisions. I wasn’t in the interviews and I don’t know the state of Jones recovery or the intimate details of his injuries. The player they drafted instead could wear a gold jacket some day.

How can I act like a dick without knowing?

I loved the offseason and draft.

I think we have the right leadership team in place and they appear to be on the same page.

I don’t believe the QB sucks, not close to elite either, but I believe his talents play in this offense if we protect him reasonably.

It is easy to look forward to this season for me.

Training camp is just around the corner, more will become clear.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Every year for the past few years I have thought we have gotten better  
Bold Ruler : Mod : 5/13/2024 11:35 am : link
in the offseason. But at 48 years old, I think I've finally come to realize that we just don't know what the offseason moves will amount to on the field. Wait for the season to start and we will see. It's possible Nabers will make a big difference for Jones. It's possible it will be more of the same. Who knows.
Hahahahahahaha  
averagejoe : 5/13/2024 11:48 am : link
thanks for the laughs. Awesome parody post :

Schoen did a great job negotiating the Jones contract..lol...good stuff...
I am programmed to be a " glass half full " person by nature  
Rjanyg : 5/13/2024 11:50 am : link
I believe a lot of what you stated.

Keys to me are:

Signed 5 veteran OL to add to the mix. Smart move since college ball is not developing OL ready to play.

Trading for Burns as opposed to0 signing McKinney. I loved McKinney but over paying for a safety is not a wise allocation of resources. Paying elite pass rushers is wise.

Drafting a stud WR1 and not overpaying Barkley while signing a cheaper vet in Singletary and adding a young rooking was the way to also allocate resources based on positional value.

Fortifying the secondary with day 2 picks is also smart.

Adding Lock and letting Taylor go was also a good move IMO.

How good will we be? Not sure but I like the make up of our roster.

I can see us sucking and going QB and DT early next year. I can see us middle of the pack as well.

If you tend to think what the Giants do is generally smart  
Mike from Ohio : 5/13/2024 12:21 pm : link
then yes, you probably look at this offseason and it is exciting because you believe all the moves were smart.

If you tend to be more skeptic about the Giants given the past several years, you tend to see opportunities missed and decisions that may or may not work out.

I think this offseason confirmed for everyone what they already believed - the Giants hired the right people or they didn't. I don't think anyone changed their mind based on the offseason activity.

The only proof we will get is when they start playing games that matter.
Hmmmm...  
bw in dc : 5/13/2024 12:22 pm : link
Quote:
Schoen did a great job negotiating the Jones contract.


(Quick disclaimer: I absolutely believe Schoen drove the Jones contract, not Mara)

Now, a sentence like this takes an incredible imagination - consider that a euphemism - to call that outcome great.

Right now, Jones is paid at the 10th best player in the NFL heading into the 2024 season. Just think about that. There is absolutely nothing great about that.

Rewarding a player for 15 passing TDs and playing well in a playoff game against a putrid Minnesota D, was much better handled with another one-year, prove it deal. Which, btw, would have avoided the injury clause issue, too...
RE: Every year for the past few years I have thought we have gotten better  
Beer Man : 5/13/2024 12:24 pm : link
In comment 16513377 Bold Ruler said:
Quote:
in the offseason. But at 48 years old, I think I've finally come to realize that we just don't know what the offseason moves will amount to on the field. Wait for the season to start and we will see. It's possible Nabers will make a big difference for Jones. It's possible it will be more of the same. Who knows.
Is that a way of saying that winning the offseason means very little? (8>
RE: Every year for the past few years I have thought we have gotten better  
widmerseyebrow : 5/13/2024 12:31 pm : link
In comment 16513377 Bold Ruler said:
Quote:
in the offseason. But at 48 years old, I think I've finally come to realize that we just don't know what the offseason moves will amount to on the field. Wait for the season to start and we will see. It's possible Nabers will make a big difference for Jones. It's possible it will be more of the same. Who knows.


^^^

If you criticized the team or the sitting GM right after a draft at any point in the last 10+ years (Reese, Gettleman), you would have been painted as an insufferable negative Nancy at best. And yet you would have been correct most years.

I think we're all sick of hearing "it's different this time" in the offseason.
Dust hasn't settled yet  
56goat : 5/13/2024 12:39 pm : link
I would say there were some moves made that should help the team, and some missed opportunities to help the team even more. It is hard to believe that we won't be better than the shitshow last season was at times, but that's why they play the games. Talk is cheap, some me some results.
RE: Hmmmm...  
Thegratefulhead : 5/13/2024 12:43 pm : link
In comment 16513429 bw in dc said:
Quote:


Quote:


Schoen did a great job negotiating the Jones contract.



(Quick disclaimer: I absolutely believe Schoen drove the Jones contract, not Mara)

Now, a sentence like this takes an incredible imagination - consider that a euphemism - to call that outcome great.

Right now, Jones is paid at the 10th best player in the NFL heading into the 2024 season. Just think about that. There is absolutely nothing great about that.

Rewarding a player for 15 passing TDs and playing well in a playoff game against a putrid Minnesota D, was much better handled with another one-year, prove it deal. Which, btw, would have avoided the injury clause issue, too...
BW i know what the hind sight looked like. IDGAF. I the were year 1 GM coach that were the toast of town. There was no way Jones was not getting signed. It was the easiest thing in the world to predict. I wont go down this road with you. Live in your world with your narrative. I respect your opinion, I LOOK for your posts. I am confident I have a good grasp of your opinion on this. I totally disagree.
logical analysis  
TheBlueprintNC : 5/13/2024 12:43 pm : link
if the OL comes together -this team takes off like a rocket, sell me your shares i believe if DaBalls and Carmine getting it right
i was a fan of  
TheBlueprintNC : 5/13/2024 12:45 pm : link
not breaking the bank for a safety and a rb.. two positions that can be replaced for lower investment.. DE great add of Burns - Defense wins championships
There's  
darren in pdx : 5/13/2024 12:47 pm : link
too many if's that need to work out for me to feel comfortable about this team. This season isn't going to be pretty, even if they did take a shot on McCarthy or Penix. What I need to see is player development from the players going into year 2 and 3. Maybe not be the most tragically inept o-line and most injured team for once? If that doesn't happen then the Giants are stuck where they have been for the past decade.

Better until it doesn't show on the field. This season is all about the future and showing actual progression and not another season of regression because the QB situation is what it is and the overall team needs to build up until that is figured out.
The team  
Gman11 : 5/13/2024 12:51 pm : link
fortified the offensive line. Brought in another pass rusher. Added a guy in the draft who could become an All-Pro. Added depth in the defensive backfield.

Unless there continue to be a bunch of injuries to key personnel I think we should see marked improvement over last year's debacle.
To respond to BW point  
Dave on the UWS : 5/13/2024 12:58 pm : link
(which he makes almost daily), its "highly" likely that Schoen wanted to FT Jones. That would have required signing Barkley to a contract FIRST, (which very well may have been driven by Mara). He worked it out to keep both, but it ended up giving Jones a higher contract than he should have gotten.
He DID give himself a workable out after 2 years, which makes this contract manageable (when compared to others like Watson's in Cleveland for example).
I agree with your very first point about getting better  
Matt M. : 5/13/2024 1:00 pm : link
I stopped reading with "Schoen did a great job negotiating the Jones contract."
Not comfortable  
Thegratefulhead : 5/13/2024 1:01 pm : link
Hopeful is a much better term and to be fair, I am also hard wired to be glass half full. I will always butt with the half empty. The low stat totals for 2022 mean little to me. I judge that season from orbit as a Giant success. Everyone had us last before the season. We had a winning season and a playoff win.

We all have EXCUSES for the data that does not support our narratives.

I feel this Giants team has little to do with the teams of the last 10 years. I judge Schoen/Daboll separately. The DG hire was still Mara designed and those and the Shurmur years I do lump together. Like BW, I believe the Jones decision to be Schoen’s and without influence.

Their scorecard for me is.

Killing it with a shit roster an giving me an unexpected season. A+

Crazy injuries scuttled a season that they were not prepared for, they believed the hype. The team still played hard. D+

We riding a B but I think these guys have the chops.
If you think the Giants HAD to sign Jones to a big deal  
Darwinian : 5/13/2024 1:10 pm : link
simply because he won a wild card game as a 6 seed, a season where his passing metrics were poor and the team struggled to score points, then you are probably someone who doesn't care for deep analysis and is content taking superficial and random outcomes on their face.
The Jones contract was not one of Schoen better moves  
George from PA : 5/13/2024 1:39 pm : link
I am not sure who he else would have made that commitment to Jones
The Giants had to make a decision  
BJacobs The Tiptoe Bandit : 5/13/2024 1:44 pm : link
Pay Jones or Barkley. It really was as simple as that. The arrow was pointing way up. We were all excited going into last year.

Sometimes things don't work out. It's easy in hindsight to be 100% correct all of the time. If the point of the OP here is that the contract doesn't cripple us for the next 3 years then it's true that it was a "good contract".



Whether the Giants improved or not is not really the question.  
Tom in NY : 5/13/2024 1:48 pm : link
The issue is if they have improved MORE than their competition, which they were starting out behind.

It's still to be seen.
Phila, while not without flaws and/or personnel losses, did seem to have a very good offseason.
Dallas, the Giants have not beaten with Prescott at QB since 2016.
Wash seems to have put a foundation in. We'll need to see how successful their decisions are.

It seems like it comes down to 4 positions for the Giants:
1. QB - enough said already
2. RT (Oline on the whole, but truly RT)
3. CB - opposite Banks (who still needs to improve) AND Slot CB
4. Dline - who plays other than D.Lawrence?

One could argue skill positions belong there is well, but for the moment I am going to assume the WR Corps, TE group, and RB group can at least be league average (maybe a big assumption on my part).

IF they get positive answers to those 4 questions, they might be able to have a competitive/successful season....If not, they are back in the top 10 in 2025 draft.
I am with Bold Ruler.  
Keaton028 : 5/13/2024 1:48 pm : link
Every year we hear about how this team has gotten better. Most years they prove that notion wrong. I am not getting my hopes up about this team until they start winning games and proving to actually be better. Talk is cheap. I won’t flood the site every day with pessimistic posts, but how can you actually believe that this team knows what it is doing provided the last decade+ of sample size.

I am not getting sucked in again. Every offseason we develop hope. Most every September/October they start 1-5 or 1-6. You want to take emotion out of it, fine. Those are the unbiased facts.

RE: Every year for the past few years I have thought we have gotten better  
BocaGene : 5/13/2024 1:50 pm : link
"I looked deeply at the all-22 of the first 5 games"

Can we get a link for those 5 games? I remember screaming to my wife that DJ is going to get killed by all those sacks.

I don't agree about the contract  
Lines of Scrimmage : 5/13/2024 2:00 pm : link
NEFT was the better play. The transition tag was stupid.

Biggest impact players in 2022: DJ, SB, AT, Dex, Leo, Jax, X, Love and Thibs. Remains to be seen what impact the new players will have. 2022 is the only year where DJ, AT and SB played the whole season together healthy.

Biggest issue continues to be good enough on the D front/OL. Both need to be good this season to continue with this regime intact heading into 2025 imv.
I am almost always happy at this time of year  
mfjmfj : 5/13/2024 2:09 pm : link
because we have new talent that the team wants, and I don't know enough to reasonably believe they are wrong. I will say Gettlmen was an exception to that. The idiocy of drafting Barkley, rather than QB or trade down, takes zero knowledge of the players and just basic football knowledge. Wasn't happy with him before that. After that my running assumption about his decisions was negative. Unfortunately, the assumption was usually correct.
Few fans who haven't lived through a drought  
WillieYoung : 5/13/2024 2:14 pm : link
realize that the draft/Free agency has less to do with a teams improvement than the individual improvement of the players already on your roster. Do Thibbs, Banks, JMS, Robinson, Hyatt, McFadden, Belton, Bellinger continue to improve? If so, look out.
RE: I don't agree about the contract  
bw in dc : 5/13/2024 2:24 pm : link
In comment 16513534 Lines of Scrimmage said:
Quote:
NEFT was the better play. The transition tag was stupid.



Why was the transition tag a stupid idea?
RE: RE: Hmmmm...  
bw in dc : 5/13/2024 2:34 pm : link
In comment 16513448 Thegratefulhead said:
Quote:
BW i know what the hind sight looked like. IDGAF. I the were year 1 GM coach that were the toast of town. There was no way Jones was not getting signed. It was the easiest thing in the world to predict. I wont go down this road with you. Live in your world with your narrative. I respect your opinion, I LOOK for your posts. I am confident I have a good grasp of your opinion on this. I totally disagree.


You need to look at this through the lens of reasonability.

What was the more reasonable approach? Rewarding a good year or a great year?

If Jones had a great year in 2022, there is a much stronger case for the multi-year contract.

But his 2022 was good. And what brought his performance up to good was the running performance, not the passing.

So, there was much more to prove, especially on the passing side with Jones. Thus, applying either tag was much more reasonable that the 4yr contract. And this isn't hindsight. It was discussed in depth on the board from the end of the season through Jones re-signing in March of 2023.
That Minnesota game had to have been the single greatest  
nygiantfan : 5/13/2024 2:35 pm : link
achievement by an NFL QB in the history of the sport.

Somehow this wildcard victory provided tremendous leverage to Team Jones, a QB that had a winning percentage of about 35% over his first 60 starts while throwing for only 62 TDs and 42 Ints.

And even despite this leverage, Schoen is described by this OP doing a great job negotiating this contract only giving Jones a $160M deal with only a mere $90M in guarantees and a decent injury guarantee.

Thank goodness Schoen kept his head about him while putting this one on the books.
RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm...  
Thegratefulhead : 5/13/2024 2:56 pm : link
In comment 16513565 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 16513448 Thegratefulhead said:


Quote:


BW i know what the hind sight looked like. IDGAF. I the were year 1 GM coach that were the toast of town. There was no way Jones was not getting signed. It was the easiest thing in the world to predict. I wont go down this road with you. Live in your world with your narrative. I respect your opinion, I LOOK for your posts. I am confident I have a good grasp of your opinion on this. I totally disagree.



You need to look at this through the lens of reasonability.

What was the more reasonable approach? Rewarding a good year or a great year?

If Jones had a great year in 2022, there is a much stronger case for the multi-year contract.

But his 2022 was good. And what brought his performance up to good was the running performance, not the passing.

So, there was much more to prove, especially on the passing side with Jones. Thus, applying either tag was much more reasonable that the 4yr contract. And this isn't hindsight. It was discussed in depth on the board from the end of the season through Jones re-signing in March of 2023.
getting new ink atm. I want to answer this. Can’t atm
Bw  
Lines of Scrimmage : 5/13/2024 2:59 pm : link
Why would you want to use the transition tag?

More leverage with the NEFT with the draft compensation and the financial impact of the two tags is not very big.
I prefer to say that Schoen did the best he could do with Jones's deal  
BlackLight : 5/13/2024 3:02 pm : link
Plenty argue that they should've FT'd him and made him prove it, but that would've likely meant we let Barkley walk away and/or we don't have the money to sign Okereke. It's unclear that we'd be in any better a spot then than we are now.
The Jones deal wasn’t  
Keaton028 : 5/13/2024 3:29 pm : link
good and Jones ain’t it at QB. It’s just one thing among a myriad of issues the Giants have had forever. The OLine is still at best an unknown, at worst an ongoing mess. It remains to be seen if some mid-tier free agent signings can bolster the unit, but we are relying on Neal to develop for this unit to succeed. We are praying for AT to stay healthy. Do we have depth on offense? We are also relying on a rookie Nabers to breathe life into this offense. Outside of him it is mostly the same unit as last year sans Barkley. I don’t know. For me it is a lot of placing faith into health and unproven players, which the Giants recently haven’t been lucky with.
RE: The Jones deal wasn’t  
Brown_Hornet : 5/13/2024 3:35 pm : link
In comment 16513609 Keaton028 said:
Quote:
good and Jones ain’t it at QB. It’s just one thing among a myriad of issues the Giants have had forever. The OLine is still at best an unknown, at worst an ongoing mess. It remains to be seen if some mid-tier free agent signings can bolster the unit, but we are relying on Neal to develop for this unit to succeed. We are praying for AT to stay healthy. Do we have depth on offense? We are also relying on a rookie Nabers to breathe life into this offense. Outside of him it is mostly the same unit as last year sans Barkley. I don’t know. For me it is a lot of placing faith into health and unproven players, which the Giants recently haven’t been lucky with.
That's not all wrong, but what was the alternative?
RE: Hmmmm...  
EJNNJ : 5/13/2024 3:46 pm : link
In comment 16513429 bw in dc said:
Quote:


Quote:


Schoen did a great job negotiating the Jones contract.







(Quick disclaimer: I absolutely believe Schoen drove the Jones contract, not Mara)

Now, a sentence like this takes an incredible imagination - consider that a euphemism - to call that outcome great.

Right now, Jones is paid at the 10th best player in the NFL heading into the 2024 season. Just think about that. There is absolutely nothing great about that.

Rewarding a player for 15 passing TDs and playing well in a playoff game against a putrid Minnesota D, was much better handled with another one-year, prove it deal. Which, btw, would have avoided the injury clause issue, too...



I think the "Great Job" is seen in term of the contract not the $$, He was going to get paid and we had to pay up for the optionality of getting out if it didn't play out well. I'd much rather have the 2-3 year out than than a 5-7yr albatross.
Brown Hornet  
Keaton028 : 5/13/2024 3:50 pm : link
It might not have been popular in the moment but I always thought making Jones “do it again” was the right answer. The franchise tag would have been expensive but not binding long term.

Im not down on Joe Schoen or Daboll yet, but more just not ready to pronounce the Giants as a better team as OP states. There biggest issues are still their biggest issues. They are not a better team until they prove it. If people want the warm and fuzzies about this team, by all means, but I don’t see a real basis for it.
*  
Keaton028 : 5/13/2024 3:51 pm : link
Their biggest issues are still their biggest issues.
I don't see how you can say that Jones had all the leverage  
Milton : 5/13/2024 4:05 pm : link
The Giants could've tagged him. Sure, it would've meant allowing Barkley to test free agency, but clearly Schoen and Daboll were not enamored of Barkley. People here talk of Schoen/Daboll being saddled with Jones because of Mara, but their actions demonstrate it was Barkley to whom they were saddled.

As I see it, there were only two reasons to opt for going with the $40M/year four year deal over the $32M franchise tag: 1) they feared Carolina would sign him; 2) coming off a 2022 season that exceeded expectations, they were confident 2023 would be a banner year and felt Jones would command $50M/year in 2024.
RE: I don't see how you can say that Jones had all the leverage  
Sean : 5/13/2024 4:17 pm : link
In comment 16513648 Milton said:
Quote:
The Giants could've tagged him. Sure, it would've meant allowing Barkley to test free agency, but clearly Schoen and Daboll were not enamored of Barkley. People here talk of Schoen/Daboll being saddled with Jones because of Mara, but their actions demonstrate it was Barkley to whom they were saddled.

As I see it, there were only two reasons to opt for going with the $40M/year four year deal over the $32M franchise tag: 1) they feared Carolina would sign him; 2) coming off a 2022 season that exceeded expectations, they were confident 2023 would be a banner year and felt Jones would command $50M/year in 2024.

Teams don't get to the divisional round and change course. If there are examples of it, I'd love to hear them. I think it's simple: Mara/Schoen/Daboll wanted the opportunity to keep building what they achieved in 2022. That's it. And that included Jones AND Barkley. That's what it was and Schoen referenced Jones age multiple times.

Tampa is the closest example and they are doing the same thing. Mayfield is a more advantageous contract but they learned from the Giants mistakes. But, they're still making a significant financial investment in Mayfield.
Didn't the Rams reach the Super Bowl and change course  
nygiantfan : 5/13/2024 4:21 pm : link
by going to Stafford?
RE: I prefer to say that Schoen did the best he could do with Jones's deal  
TyreeHelmet : 5/13/2024 4:23 pm : link
In comment 16513597 BlackLight said:
Quote:
Plenty argue that they should've FT'd him and made him prove it, but that would've likely meant we let Barkley walk away and/or we don't have the money to sign Okereke. It's unclear that we'd be in any better a spot then than we are now.


Its clear as day to me. Unless Jones play to a top 10 level this season, you are not getting good value on that contract. Simply as that.

Not to mention the money spent last year and the likely dead hit in 2025.

They 100% would have been better off now tagging him.
RE: Didn't the Rams reach the Super Bowl and change course  
Sean : 5/13/2024 4:26 pm : link
In comment 16513662 nygiantfan said:
Quote:
by going to Stafford?

When did Goff got paid? I don't recall the exact timing. And that wasn't the next season. I'm talking about the next season.
The Rams paid Goff after the Super Bowl loss  
Sean : 5/13/2024 4:28 pm : link
.
RE: I don't see how you can say that Jones had all the leverage  
TyreeHelmet : 5/13/2024 4:40 pm : link
In comment 16513648 Milton said:
Quote:
The Giants could've tagged him. Sure, it would've meant allowing Barkley to test free agency, but clearly Schoen and Daboll were not enamored of Barkley. People here talk of Schoen/Daboll being saddled with Jones because of Mara, but their actions demonstrate it was Barkley to whom they were saddled.

As I see it, there were only two reasons to opt for going with the $40M/year four year deal over the $32M franchise tag: 1) they feared Carolina would sign him; 2) coming off a 2022 season that exceeded expectations, they were confident 2023 would be a banner year and felt Jones would command $50M/year in 2024.


You truly never know but Carolina traded for the 1st overall pick at about the same time. They weren't in on Jones.

And if they were confident 2023 would be a banner year, they would have been happy to pay him more for 2024 and beyond.

The Giants had all the leverage and it was perfect case for the franchise tag. Schoen blew it.
I can't believe how this board misses the obvious  
Darwinian : 5/13/2024 4:48 pm : link
The move with Jones was to do what the Bucs did with Mayfield. Let him become an unrestricted free agent. There was no great market for Jones, for a limited QB who never showed great production and was coming off of a 15 TD season where he played the whole season. But of course the Giants are not as smart as the Bucs and negotiated against themselves.
RE: I can't believe how this board misses the obvious  
JT039 : 5/13/2024 4:58 pm : link
In comment 16513684 Darwinian said:
Quote:
The move with Jones was to do what the Bucs did with Mayfield. Let him become an unrestricted free agent. There was no great market for Jones, for a limited QB who never showed great production and was coming off of a 15 TD season where he played the whole season. But of course the Giants are not as smart as the Bucs and negotiated against themselves.


“Jinkies!!” If every team was as smart as you.
RE: RE: I can't believe how this board misses the obvious  
Darwinian : 5/13/2024 5:05 pm : link
In comment 16513698 JT039 said:
Quote:
In comment 16513684 Darwinian said:


Quote:


The move with Jones was to do what the Bucs did with Mayfield. Let him become an unrestricted free agent. There was no great market for Jones, for a limited QB who never showed great production and was coming off of a 15 TD season where he played the whole season. But of course the Giants are not as smart as the Bucs and negotiated against themselves.



“Jinkies!!” If every team was as smart as you.


Back to stalking posters on here, I see? What happened? The school yard was empty?
RE: Bw  
bw in dc : 5/13/2024 5:39 pm : link
In comment 16513594 Lines of Scrimmage said:
Quote:
Why would you want to use the transition tag?

More leverage with the NEFT with the draft compensation and the financial impact of the two tags is not very big.


I preferred the TT because no team was giving NYG two first rounders to possibly acquire Jones. No team did it with LJax. So, that was a non-starter from the start.

The TT, however, had no such restrictions and would have given us a true idea of what the NFL market thought about Jones. And Schoen still had the final say to match whatever offer Jones may have received. Per ajr and his insights, the feeling around the NFL was Jones was not worth more than $20-$25M AAV.

What is the downside/stupidity of that?
BW  
Thegratefulhead : 5/13/2024 5:41 pm : link
You think it plausible they tag, let him go or sign him for less? Not situationally, Jones was getting signed by NYG after the unexpected season. EVERYONE that mattered wanted him back and he wanted to be back. It was getting done.

They declined his option, made training camp harder on him on purpose and Jones answered the bell. They were in the trenches together, it was too much of risk to ask a young GM/coach team to pivot from Jones. If they shared your views on his ability to play QB in the NFL.

The NY Giants have made no effort to replace to Jones. The best is we have are reports they tried to trade up. Did they really? It doesn’t seem like it.
RE: If you tend to think what the Giants do is generally smart  
SteelGiant : 5/13/2024 6:47 pm : link
In comment 16513428 Mike from Ohio said:
Quote:
then yes, you probably look at this offseason and it is exciting because you believe all the moves were smart.

If you tend to be more skeptic about the Giants given the past several years, you tend to see opportunities missed and decisions that may or may not work out.

I think this offseason confirmed for everyone what they already believed - the Giants hired the right people or they didn't. I don't think anyone changed their mind based on the offseason activity.

The only proof we will get is when they start playing games that matter.


I think this ranks as one fairest statements on this site. Good Job
Did we improve as much as the other NFCE teams?  
Jint Fan in Buc Land : 5/13/2024 7:15 pm : link
I agree we got better but that's the goal of every team; did we improve more than most?

Nabers is a stud, Nubin should be good, Phillips is an experienced SEC corner who's never made an interception (???), Tyrone Tracy is the next Deebo and Muasa is definitely a game changer (eyes roll back into my skull).

Hey at least we added a vet guard who was decent with his last team named Glowinski... oh wait he didn't work out but Runyan absolutely will.

I'm done with every summer trying to twist myself into thinking the moves I just watched will lead the team to compete when I know they won't.

Washington is pulling ahead, just because you watch doesn't mean you have to believe they will be good just do it out of tradition. There's sufficient evidence at this point to back up that approach but it's america so please do as you like.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner