Browns have Garrett but they are not loaded at DT or the other end spot. The 49erd have a better group. The Giants DL will consist of Lawrence, Burns and Thibodeaux but I feel like they consider the latter two as linebackers. They still play on the line, as does Watt.
Sauce might be the most overrated player in the league
Browns have Garrett but they are not loaded at DT or the other end spot. The 49erd have a better group. The Giants DL will consist of Lawrence, Burns and Thibodeaux but I feel like they consider the latter two as linebackers. They still play on the line, as does Watt.
Correct on two of those Giants being counted as LBs. the Giants’ DL doesn’t look like much other than Dex.
Browns have Garrett but they are not loaded at DT or the other end spot. The 49erd have a better group. The Giants DL will consist of Lawrence, Burns and Thibodeaux but I feel like they consider the latter two as linebackers. They still play on the line, as does Watt.
Correct on two of those Giants being counted as LBs. the Giants’ DL doesn’t look like much other than Dex.
They need a little luck with their prospects.
So non 4-3 teams aren't included then. I figure they would have used IDL and "Edge" as the other.
RE: Sauce might be the most overrated player in the league
Browns have Garrett but they are not loaded at DT or the other end spot. The 49erd have a better group. The Giants DL will consist of Lawrence, Burns and Thibodeaux but I feel like they consider the latter two as linebackers. They still play on the line, as does Watt.
___________
I am really interested to see Bowen’s base defense. If he uses the 4-man front he has used in the past, Burns and Thibs will have to line up more as DEs than as rush LBs. I could imagine him showing a 5-man front on early downs where Burns or Thibs would drop into coverage and the other would rush.
aybe the Giants are in the top 3 in some of those areas other then
I don't know about that.
Miami has some good receivers even the Eagles
I don’t really believe that…it’s a joke.
Browns have Garrett but they are not loaded at DT or the other end spot. The 49erd have a better group. The Giants DL will consist of Lawrence, Burns and Thibodeaux but I feel like they consider the latter two as linebackers. They still play on the line, as does Watt.
Browns have Garrett but they are not loaded at DT or the other end spot. The 49erd have a better group. The Giants DL will consist of Lawrence, Burns and Thibodeaux but I feel like they consider the latter two as linebackers. They still play on the line, as does Watt.
Correct on two of those Giants being counted as LBs. the Giants’ DL doesn’t look like much other than Dex.
They need a little luck with their prospects.
Quote:
Splitting hairs to me re: DL.
Browns have Garrett but they are not loaded at DT or the other end spot. The 49erd have a better group. The Giants DL will consist of Lawrence, Burns and Thibodeaux but I feel like they consider the latter two as linebackers. They still play on the line, as does Watt.
Correct on two of those Giants being counted as LBs. the Giants’ DL doesn’t look like much other than Dex.
They need a little luck with their prospects.
So non 4-3 teams aren't included then. I figure they would have used IDL and "Edge" as the other.
He is VERY grabby.
Yes, NFCN should be fun to watch, especially if JJM hits the ground running.
Browns have Garrett but they are not loaded at DT or the other end spot. The 49erd have a better group. The Giants DL will consist of Lawrence, Burns and Thibodeaux but I feel like they consider the latter two as linebackers. They still play on the line, as does Watt.
I am really interested to see Bowen’s base defense. If he uses the 4-man front he has used in the past, Burns and Thibs will have to line up more as DEs than as rush LBs. I could imagine him showing a 5-man front on early downs where Burns or Thibs would drop into coverage and the other would rush.