There are very few teams who have established enough units that they can know for sure. So much projection. Dallas has a couple of new starters including supposedly a rookie LT. But they’re 10th why? Whatever, it fills the space.
There are very few teams who have established enough units that they can know for sure. So much projection. Dallas has a couple of new starters including supposedly a rookie LT. But they’re 10th why? Whatever, it fills the space.
Exactly! Let's see what these guys do on the field first, shall we?
The o line was so bad last year that adding mediocre players should yield a much improved line. And i am not counting on Neal.
I hope so.. but adding Runyan and Eluemunor while losing Bredeson and Tyre Phillips.. and of course there's already a news flash out there that Bredeson was turning heads at BUCs OTA's..here we go again.. we'll see. Signed some veteran depth in Stinnie and adding Stoll or Manhertz should help. Still can't believe they didn't draft any OL though as bad as they were last year. Would have rathered they went OL, DL day 2 and taken a chance with Belton, A Robinson, McCloud, and Trey Hawkins.. but what do I know
RE: Projecting next year’s OLs rankings is a fool’s errand
There are very few teams who have established enough units that they can know for sure. So much projection. Dallas has a couple of new starters including supposedly a rookie LT. But they’re 10th why? Whatever, it fills the space.
And Feliciano. Both guys made it to the conf finals and graded well. So I’ll just ignore BBI and many of the talking heads who know jack shit about OL play.
When see a PFF published a list of the jam and eggers who do the ratings w their resumes I’ll be more than happy to give them credit for knowing what the are looking at. Never mind grading every OL every game Ina day when they aren’t privy to the play books
I think I saw that the group from last year who they entered the year with as starters played 70 snaps together. There is nothing Bricillo or anyone else could do to recover from that. Thomas, Neal, JMS, Eluemunor, Ezeudu, Nelson, and Runyan all missed time from injury last year to varying degrees.
One of the things that gets me, is how the Eagles manage to stay so healthy. 4 of their 5 starters played 85%+. Only one original starter for the Giants played over 70%, 9 played over 24%. Pugh off his couch was 2nd.
And Feliciano. Both guys made it to the conf finals and graded well. So I’ll just ignore BBI and many of the talking heads who know jack shit about OL play.
When see a PFF published a list of the jam and eggers who do the ratings w their resumes I’ll be more than happy to give them credit for knowing what the are looking at. Never mind grading every OL every game Ina day when they aren’t privy to the play books
Hate is a strong word. His cut was all about salary cap. That was the year where the salary actually decreased. It saved them $12M and only cost $2.5M dead.
It seems clear that not many teams have clearly superior talent on the OL.
It’s amazing how terrible our OL has been. I like what we’ve done this off-season to fix it. Hope it works
Exactly! Let's see what these guys do on the field first, shall we?
I hope so.. but adding Runyan and Eluemunor while losing Bredeson and Tyre Phillips.. and of course there's already a news flash out there that Bredeson was turning heads at BUCs OTA's..here we go again.. we'll see. Signed some veteran depth in Stinnie and adding Stoll or Manhertz should help. Still can't believe they didn't draft any OL though as bad as they were last year. Would have rathered they went OL, DL day 2 and taken a chance with Belton, A Robinson, McCloud, and Trey Hawkins.. but what do I know
It's pretty ludicrous isn't it.
When see a PFF published a list of the jam and eggers who do the ratings w their resumes I’ll be more than happy to give them credit for knowing what the are looking at. Never mind grading every OL every game Ina day when they aren’t privy to the play books
One of the things that gets me, is how the Eagles manage to stay so healthy. 4 of their 5 starters played 85%+. Only one original starter for the Giants played over 70%, 9 played over 24%. Pugh off his couch was 2nd.
When see a PFF published a list of the jam and eggers who do the ratings w their resumes I’ll be more than happy to give them credit for knowing what the are looking at. Never mind grading every OL every game Ina day when they aren’t privy to the play books
Hate is a strong word. His cut was all about salary cap. That was the year where the salary actually decreased. It saved them $12M and only cost $2.5M dead.
It’s amazing how terrible our OL has been. I like what we’ve done this off-season to fix it. Hope it works
Thank-you.