for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

2022 draft-who would you have taken over Neal?

Tony in Tampa : 7/8/2024 9:09 am
Look, it’s a Duh! to say Evan Neal has been a huge disappointment. Doesn’t have the feet to play NFL OT and is constantly hurt.
While I’m sure it’s little comfort to Schoen, I have yet to hear a draft analyst give me the OT they would have taken in the 2022 draft over Neal. He was pretty much #1 on everyone’s board.

But hay, Schoen is paid to get it right. The buck stops with him. No one cares that most everyone also got taking Neal wrong, they didn't take him, we did.

Who would you have taken instead of Neal? Hutchinson and Sauce were gone. While KT has shown some promise, he has not been stellar. But I guess you can’t pass on taking a top quality edge. So assuming you still take KT at 5, who would you have taken at 7.
Looking at the rest of the top 10, the obvious answer is WR Garret Wilson. But do Giants with a piss poor OL really walk away from a draft where they have 2 top 10 picks and not take a OT?

Other #1 OTs taken: Ikem Ekwonu, Charles Cross, Trevor Penning, Tyler Smith . Smith is the best of that bunch, a pro bowler and far better than Neal. But do you kill Schoen for passing on (not trading down for) a kid from Tulsa over Neal the consensus #1 OT from Bama?

We are all disappointed by what Neal appears to be, but was it obvious he would stink? Avoidable? I looked at Sy's review of Neal from 2022. He had his concerns about Neal not making positive steps forward in his last year at BAMA, but he felt those issues were correctable. Some times prospects just don’t pan out.
...  
ryanmkeane : 7/8/2024 9:11 am : link
Garrett Wilson, Chris Olave, Kyle Hamilton
,,  
Named Later : 7/8/2024 9:17 am : link
I would have taken Garrett Wilson.
I would have traded back.....with one of the picks.  
George from PA : 7/8/2024 9:21 am : link
Hoping to get future ones.....and additional picks.

My general approach.....

If roster sucks with a ton of wholes.....I would want more draft picks.

If roster is solid.....I would focus on BPA.

If roster is strong....targeting more blue chippers...by trading up...fine tuning.



At the time  
Reale01 : 7/8/2024 9:25 am : link
Wilson was really the only player you would consider unless you traded down. I would have run to the podium with the Neal pick and was very happy about it.

Trading down may have actually have been possible and gotten a good return as I am sure there were other teams that wanted Neal.

I don't see how anyone can kill the Giants about the pick.

PS - I have not given up on Neal. Lets see what he can do if he is able to get healthy and stay healthy.
It was Neal or Ekwonu  
David B. : 7/8/2024 9:27 am : link
But I would have taken Neal. There was nothing wrong with the Neal pick on draft day. Based on the data everyone had, it was a great pick. Probably better than the Andrew Thomas pick looked on his draft day.
Ekwonu was taken before Neal,  
Section331 : 7/8/2024 9:28 am : link
so he wouldn’t be an option. Schoen would have been roasted for taking Tyler Smith at 7, I think Cross would have been much more likely. Even with the glaring need at OT, I would have gone for Olave, and looked for a RT in rd 2.

All that said, while it’s hard to bash Schoen too much for taking Neal given that he was almost universally seen as a top 10 pick, his refusal to work out even at his pro day should have raised some red flags.
I would have taken Neal. He was the right prospect for the Giants  
ThomasG : 7/8/2024 9:33 am : link
to focus in on and Schoen made a very reasonable pick where the investment hasn't paid off. While it hasn't started off at all well for him but it still could work out. Although Neal can't be a liability for much longer, maybe another 8 games or so?

Thibs would have been the prospect I would have reconsidered at the time of the draft. Still would.
Obviously Wilson  
mittenedman : 7/8/2024 9:39 am : link
which then frees up the Nabers pick for something else - maybe Joe Alt.

If not Wilson, Hamilton would’ve been great (DPOY type year) but I don’t think Schoen likes the positional value there.

So if Schoen didn’t go Wilson, I think it would’ve been Charles Cross.
I would have taken Neal  
Mike in NY : 7/8/2024 9:42 am : link
The Giants OL was in need of help and we were staring at a player who was almost universally at worst the #2 OT in the class (and also ranked by many in the Top 5 overall). Hard to pass on that for a skill position (Wilson was BPA there) when you had a QB getting pummeled. Unfortunately no QB was worth the pick (I would have looked at trading down and stockpile picks with an eye towards drafting a QB in 2023).
RE: Obviously Wilson  
Mike in NY : 7/8/2024 9:43 am : link
In comment 16549606 mittenedman said:
Quote:
which then frees up the Nabers pick for something else - maybe Joe Alt.

If not Wilson, Hamilton would’ve been great (DPOY type year) but I don’t think Schoen likes the positional value there.

So if Schoen didn’t go Wilson, I think it would’ve been Charles Cross.


Alt went before our pick of Nabers and I think we would have been idiots to reach for Latham like Tennessee did. Some of the red flags we see with Neal I see again with Latham.
Knowing what we know now  
johnnyb : 7/8/2024 9:43 am : link
there are obvious choices, Wilson being among the top one.

But at the time, Evan Neal was considered a top pick and he "fell" to seven. I do not remeber anyone on this board complaining about the pick. He was highly rated and at one point considered the top pick in the draft.
...  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 7/8/2024 9:46 am : link
Wilson or Smith.

But, as noted above, no one was complaining about the Neal pick at the time. I just can't believe he's been this bad.
There was a lot of talk that Cross was a contender to be picked  
Metnut : 7/8/2024 9:51 am : link
by CAR or NYG ahead of the other OTs because his pass protection was so polished and ready for day 1 while the other two were more of a projection.
I would have gone Cross  
widmerseyebrow : 7/8/2024 10:00 am : link
At the time, but in hindsight you could obviously add Wilson to that. Cross was a better immediate starter than Neal with his pass pro and a perfect hedge for AT's durability. Maybe you give up a little run blocking on the right side with position fit, but having an overwhelming strength in pass protection off the edges would have been a boon to an offense that had weaknesses everywhere.
It's too easy for me to look back in hindsight and  
logman : 7/8/2024 10:12 am : link
say that I'd take some other player. In the moment, I wanted them going OL and would not have been upset with any of the three guys talked about at the time. Since CAR took Ekwonu, that leaves Neal and Cross, and I liked Neal better.

In retrospect, none of them have lived up to their draft hype, so that pick was likely to be a miss no matter what. But it's not like Schoen was alone in having Neal ranked so high. We know DAL had him #1, for example. Whatever was missed in Neal's pre-draft analysis eluded a lot of people paid a lot of money by multiple organizations.

Not a draft expert  
US1 Giants : 7/8/2024 10:18 am : link
but I would have taken Neal. The Giants have people who should know and they picked him.

I have not given up on Neal yet. I remember a lot of people on BBI had given up on Andrew Thomas.
RE: Not a draft expert  
Spider56 : 7/8/2024 10:30 am : link
In comment 16549632 US1 Giants said:
Quote:
but I would have taken Neal. The Giants have people who should know and they picked him.

I have not given up on Neal yet. I remember a lot of people on BBI had given up on Andrew Thomas.


This …. Neal was the absolute no brainer at that point, with maybe a slight and distant argument for Cross. He has this year to get his shit together.
Neal was the right pick BUT  
The Mike : 7/8/2024 10:30 am : link
That draft pick should never have happened in the first place. Gettleman should have taken Micah Parsons in 2021 instead of trading back for the pick that turned into Evan Neal. A classic case of stealing defeat from the jaws of victory.

Once Gettleman made the trade, however, the pick in 2021 should have been Christian Darrisaw, a solid tackle who would have complemented Thomas perfectly, instead of Kadarius Toney. Schoen would have then taken Garrett Wilson in 2022 and ended up with an all pro calibre wide receiver. Two talented players with very bright NFL futures, instead of two massive busts.
RE: I would have taken Neal. He was the right prospect for the Giants  
NJLCO : 7/8/2024 10:31 am : link
In comment 16549602 ThomasG said:
Quote:
to focus in on and Schoen made a very reasonable pick where the investment hasn't paid off. While it hasn't started off at all well for him but it still could work out. Although Neal can't be a liability for much longer, maybe another 8 games or so?

Thibs would have been the prospect I would have reconsidered at the time of the draft. Still would.

Agree 100% with this comment. This year IMO is going to be the year we all know if either of these picks were worth being a top ten pick. I still believe Neal may pan out if healthy. Thibs on the other hand….. I just haven’t see. It from a skill perspective. I’ve watched him in person and I just don’t see it at all on a consistent basis. He may be average at best.
At the time, I was all in on Neal  
Mike from Ohio : 7/8/2024 10:40 am : link
In hindsight, Garret Wilson.
At that time I thought Neal was the right pick  
Rick in Dallas : 7/8/2024 10:44 am : link
I was more apprehensive about the Thibs pick at 5
Ya never know about the draft
RE: RE: I would have taken Neal. He was the right prospect for the Giants  
Mbavaro : 7/8/2024 10:53 am : link
In comment 16549644 NJLCO said:
Quote:
In comment 16549602 ThomasG said:


Quote:


to focus in on and Schoen made a very reasonable pick where the investment hasn't paid off. While it hasn't started off at all well for him but it still could work out. Although Neal can't be a liability for much longer, maybe another 8 games or so?

Thibs would have been the prospect I would have reconsidered at the time of the draft. Still would.


Agree 100% with this comment. This year IMO is going to be the year we all know if either of these picks were worth being a top ten pick. I still believe Neal may pan out if healthy. Thibs on the other hand….. I just haven’t see. It from a skill perspective. I’ve watched him in person and I just don’t see it at all on a consistent basis. He may be average at best.


Average at best?

Wow…inconsistent at times…yes

Think you need to watch the games a bit closer as that isn’t even a remotely accurate observation
RE: RE: RE: I would have taken Neal. He was the right prospect for the Giants  
Mike from Ohio : 7/8/2024 10:56 am : link
In comment 16549659 Mbavaro said:
Quote:
In comment 16549644 NJLCO said:


Quote:


In comment 16549602 ThomasG said:


Quote:


to focus in on and Schoen made a very reasonable pick where the investment hasn't paid off. While it hasn't started off at all well for him but it still could work out. Although Neal can't be a liability for much longer, maybe another 8 games or so?

Thibs would have been the prospect I would have reconsidered at the time of the draft. Still would.


Agree 100% with this comment. This year IMO is going to be the year we all know if either of these picks were worth being a top ten pick. I still believe Neal may pan out if healthy. Thibs on the other hand….. I just haven’t see. It from a skill perspective. I’ve watched him in person and I just don’t see it at all on a consistent basis. He may be average at best.



Average at best?

Wow…inconsistent at times…yes

Think you need to watch the games a bit closer as that isn’t even a remotely accurate observation


You need to read more closely. He said he was inconsistent - which you agreed with. The suggestion that an inconsistent player "may" be average at best is not incorrect - it is an opinion about a future outcome.
RE: RE: RE: RE: I would have taken Neal. He was the right prospect for the Giants  
Mbavaro : 7/8/2024 11:06 am : link
In comment 16549661 Mike from Ohio said:
Quote:
In comment 16549659 Mbavaro said:


Quote:


In comment 16549644 NJLCO said:


Quote:


In comment 16549602 ThomasG said:


Quote:


to focus in on and Schoen made a very reasonable pick where the investment hasn't paid off. While it hasn't started off at all well for him but it still could work out. Although Neal can't be a liability for much longer, maybe another 8 games or so?

Thibs would have been the prospect I would have reconsidered at the time of the draft. Still would.


Agree 100% with this comment. This year IMO is going to be the year we all know if either of these picks were worth being a top ten pick. I still believe Neal may pan out if healthy. Thibs on the other hand….. I just haven’t see. It from a skill perspective. I’ve watched him in person and I just don’t see it at all on a consistent basis. He may be average at best.



Average at best?

Wow…inconsistent at times…yes

Think you need to watch the games a bit closer as that isn’t even a remotely accurate observation



You need to read more closely. He said he was inconsistent - which you agreed with. The suggestion that an inconsistent player "may" be average at best is not incorrect - it is an opinion about a future outcome.


I would say that his improvement year one to year two illustrates my point that he is not “average at best”….but is still a work in progress….ex: setting the edge better on the run

Also on that post…saying that he just “doesn’t see it”

That is what I was referring to when I said to watch the games a bit closer
RE: RE: I would have taken Neal. He was the right prospect for the Giants  
ThomasG : 7/8/2024 11:15 am : link
In comment 16549644 NJLCO said:
Quote:
In comment 16549602 ThomasG said:


Quote:


to focus in on and Schoen made a very reasonable pick where the investment hasn't paid off. While it hasn't started off at all well for him but it still could work out. Although Neal can't be a liability for much longer, maybe another 8 games or so?

Thibs would have been the prospect I would have reconsidered at the time of the draft. Still would.


Agree 100% with this comment. This year IMO is going to be the year we all know if either of these picks were worth being a top ten pick. I still believe Neal may pan out if healthy. Thibs on the other hand….. I just haven’t see. It from a skill perspective. I’ve watched him in person and I just don’t see it at all on a consistent basis. He may be average at best.


Yes NJLCO. Also somewhat concerned that Thibs' mentality is that he thinks he is already doing what he should from a production aspect. Taking full advantage of weak OLs like Washington and the Jets is great but there needs to be a true edge presence showing up weekly and against the top competition. Maybe that concern isn't the case but seems to fit his pre-draft profile.

Neal is the bigger concern (and the subject of this OP) but both 2022 draft guys need to deliver more.
...  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 7/8/2024 11:16 am : link
I think we all agree that Thibs needs to be more consistent.
RE: It was Neal or Ekwonu  
gersh : 7/8/2024 11:28 am : link
In comment 16549596 David B. said:
Quote:
But I would have taken Neal. There was nothing wrong with the Neal pick on draft day. Based on the data everyone had, it was a great pick. Probably better than the Andrew Thomas pick looked on his draft day.

This
no one  
blueblood : 7/8/2024 11:43 am : link
Need and Value met at that position. You cant draft with hindsight.
I remember that draft night and the next day! The BBI was ecstatic  
GiantBlue : 7/8/2024 12:01 pm : link
with the picks feeling that Neal would bookend Thomas for the next 10-12 years and provide pro-bowl tackle play on the left and right side.

Dallas apparently had him #1 on their draft board and you know how they pick OL! Superbly.

Do we give up on him after two injury filled seasons? Do we let Carmen get some time with him?

My point is that we wouldn't have passed on him at 5 because we needed OL in the worst way and he was the consensus #1 OT!
no one  
gogiants : 7/8/2024 12:24 pm : link
I was very happy with the selections of Thibs and Neal. They were the best values for those picks at that time. The only other player that comes up as I look at my interests then is safety Kyle Hamilton. Kind of surprised he did not go till 14 but that is probably the undervaluing of the safety position. He had a good year in his second season.
Only Neal  
sb from NYT Forum : 7/8/2024 12:37 pm : link
...we needed a RT and he looked like he'd be a better RT than Cross, who is more of a LT.

I wanted Neal  
Sy'56 : 7/8/2024 1:22 pm : link
and Garrett Willson
Would have taken Neal again  
Sean : 7/8/2024 1:40 pm : link
There was no world in which tackle wasn't going to be a pick. Need and value met. The pick hasn't worked out to date, it happens.

The shit luck is it was a bad QB draft. For all the shit Schoen gets about Jones, I'm very confident QB would have been the pick if it was literally any other year.
The draft is always a crapshoot.  
81_Great_Dane : 7/8/2024 1:43 pm : link
You can make the “right” pick and he can bust. You can cluster draft and the later pick turns out better. It’s not an exact science.

Giants picked Butch Woolfolk before Joe Morris; Eric Moore before Jumbo Elliott.

Neal was the “right” pick at the time but hasn’t played well. It happens. It really stings with a top 10 pick, but it happens.
G Wilson was BPA  
rasbutant : 7/8/2024 2:12 pm : link
But they needed Oline so bad and those guys weren’t far behind in talent in my opinion.

I liked Cross the best but Bobby Skinner review made me second guess myself. So I was on the Ekwonu train but he got selected first. Neal scared me, but was super excited to get him. Even though he scared me with his technique and falling on the ground I still thought he would be good, just not top 10 good. But really what’s the difference between top 10 and top 15 in the big scheme of things so no problem taking him where they did.

I still think he can be good. And have high hopes for him.

Can he please be healthy!!!!
RE: Neal was the right pick BUT  
sb from NYT Forum : 7/8/2024 2:29 pm : link
In comment 16549642 The Mike said:
Quote:
That draft pick should never have happened in the first place. Gettleman should have taken Micah Parsons in 2021 instead of trading back for the pick that turned into Evan Neal. A classic case of stealing defeat from the jaws of victory.

Once Gettleman made the trade, however, the pick in 2021 should have been Christian Darrisaw, a solid tackle who would have complemented Thomas perfectly, instead of Kadarius Toney. Schoen would have then taken Garrett Wilson in 2022 and ended up with an all pro calibre wide receiver. Two talented players with very bright NFL futures, instead of two massive busts.


Think about this, thanks to that move, we not only missed out on a perennial All Pro pass rusher, but we also ended up with Kadarius Toney, Evan Neal and Darren Waller. OUCH!!!
RE: RE: I would have taken Neal. He was the right prospect for the Giants  
Paulie Walnuts : 7/8/2024 2:44 pm : link
In comment 16549644 NJLCO said:
Quote:
In comment 16549602 ThomasG said:


Quote:


to focus in on and Schoen made a very reasonable pick where the investment hasn't paid off. While it hasn't started off at all well for him but it still could work out. Although Neal can't be a liability for much longer, maybe another 8 games or so?

Thibs would have been the prospect I would have reconsidered at the time of the draft. Still would.


Agree 100% with this comment. This year IMO is going to be the year we all know if either of these picks were worth being a top ten pick. I still believe Neal may pan out if healthy. Thibs on the other hand….. I just haven’t see. It from a skill perspective. I’ve watched him in person and I just don’t see it at all on a consistent basis. He may be average at best.
Neal was seen as a safe and solid pick let's see how he does this year
RE: RE: Neal was the right pick BUT  
The Mike : 7/8/2024 2:45 pm : link
In comment 16549805 sb from NYT Forum said:
Quote:
In comment 16549642 The Mike said:


Quote:


That draft pick should never have happened in the first place. Gettleman should have taken Micah Parsons in 2021 instead of trading back for the pick that turned into Evan Neal. A classic case of stealing defeat from the jaws of victory.

Once Gettleman made the trade, however, the pick in 2021 should have been Christian Darrisaw, a solid tackle who would have complemented Thomas perfectly, instead of Kadarius Toney. Schoen would have then taken Garrett Wilson in 2022 and ended up with an all pro calibre wide receiver. Two talented players with very bright NFL futures, instead of two massive busts.



Think about this, thanks to that move, we not only missed out on a perennial All Pro pass rusher, but we also ended up with Kadarius Toney, Evan Neal and Darren Waller. OUCH!!!


Yes exactly! You can't make these kinds of mistakes as it relates to evaluating talent. They are fatal! And precisely explain why this team is where it is...
I'm taking Neal at that point.  
section125 : 7/8/2024 3:29 pm : link
You do not to have the benefit of hindsight.

Shit happens and guys do not pan out.
a counter question  
BigBlueCane : 7/8/2024 3:37 pm : link
am I stuck with Bobby Johnson as OL coach?

Because I'm guessing he's a large part of the problem/solution.
And just to add  
Tony in Tampa : 7/8/2024 5:28 pm : link
I didn’t say this at the beginning but I too am pulling for Neal. He’s been a train wreck but coming out of college the guy did seem like a perfect Giants RT. After all the hopes that he’ll figure it out and off season training and the constant injuries there’s still the chance he will turn into a serviceable RT.
I liked cross over Neal  
GiantsFan84 : 7/8/2024 6:55 pm : link
.
I liked Neal  
Fifty Six : 7/8/2024 7:13 pm : link
The NFL is hard man, some people just don't pan out.
Besides being injured, Charles Cross hasn't looked  
barens : 7/8/2024 7:15 pm : link
bad.
Cross  
Thegratefulhead : 7/9/2024 9:50 am : link
Was my LT1 and I was quite vocal about it. In my opinion you take the best pass protector at tackle. I was OK with the choice though. Who didn’t like the Neal pick? I annoy criticize that pick, i can only lament the outcome so far.
Even now - I would still take Neal  
gidiefor : Mod : 7/10/2024 1:11 pm : link
I don't think the NFL book on him is over yet

I think I still wanted Kavon at 5 and I liked Neal over the pick that went right before him
Neal all the way .....  
Manny in CA : 7/10/2024 8:25 pm : link

6'7" 360, doing this !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iUcHNH5BZ8

He's still young, flashed before he got hurt. His story is not over.
With the benefit of hindsight...  
bw in dc : 7/10/2024 9:03 pm : link
a WR. But right now, that draft overall is looking weak everywhere.
Without using hindsight, nobody, really  
Matt M. : 7/11/2024 10:00 pm : link
It was a surprise he fell to them. He was projected as the potential #1 pick at one point and was a position of extreme need. To me, he was a no brainer pick. It just hasn't worked out so far.
Back to the Corner