All of the palace intrigue with Barkley and Hard Knocks has me thinking a lot about what success running the ball would be this year.
Despite a few very nice individual seasons, the Giants only ranked a top half running team once in his time in New York.
Now, make no mistake how many yards a team gains on the ground is a very good measure of how well they run, but another figure I think is interesting is how many first downs they earn on the ground. They were bottom third in the league last year with 97 rushing first downs. The Giants were 3rd to last in the NFL in total first downs.
So for me 2 things I'd like to see:
- Giants be a top 10 rushing team
- Giants be top 10 in rushing first downs
How would you guys measure success?
Based on the number and quality of veteran free agent offensive line signings this off season, if, Heaven forbid, the Giants had a repeat of the 2023 injuries in 2024, I think the Giants could handle that situation much better.
It seems like the Giants are poised to have an offense in 2024 that is geared to throw the ball more and deeper downfield. So I think the running opportunities and yardage would be expected to go down.
I guess I'd look for statistics such as:
1) Better yards / carry than 2023
2) Fewer initial contacts behind the LOS than in 2023
3) Fewer zero yardage / negative yardage plays in 2024
4) More chunk / 20+ yard running plays in 2024
As some of the "measurements of success running in 2024".
Not so concerned with called plays running left vs right vs up middle as to me that is just subject to audibles at line with a credible QB. And not for nothing, but this is a huge difference from Eli to DJ. Eli was well advanced at this. DJ not so much.
In my view, effective rushing is making the defense stay honest. Don’t let them, or at least limit them from, attacking or overloading themselves effectively versus your game plan. Keep them guessing or allowing for some pause or on their heals so the Offense can attack with less bodies in space.
Getting to 30 rushes and 4.5 yards per rush is the outcome of a win, not a pre-determined winning game plan.
When Jones was most effective in 2022, it was as a surprise / counter to Barkley's very effective running. With Barkley gone, how successful "running back by committee" is and how willing Daboll is to expose Jones to contact downfield will be interesting to watch.
Of course with all the downfield running and contact Jones had and was exposed to in 2022, it was a non-contact / in the pocket play that forced him off the field (I seem to recall the damage might have been done on the prior play; don't recall what type of play that was).
We need them to be consistently successful. Short yardage success rate. First downs and yards per carry for sure. Keep the offense on schedule. I am perfectly fine with big plays coming from the passing game, but the running game needs to be complimentary.
I would like to be more physical as well. Need to wear down the defense by being hard to bring down, keeping those legs turning for extra yardage and falling forward. So maybe break tackle rate and yards after contact would be keys to me.
What they need is the offensive line personnel to get them there.
You can analyze this all you want - it's this simple. Play with a competent oline and the number will be there to support it.
We need them to be consistently successful. Short yardage success rate. First downs and yards per carry for sure. Keep the offense on schedule. I am perfectly fine with big plays coming from the passing game, but the running game needs to be complimentary.
I would like to be more physical as well. Need to wear down the defense by being hard to bring down, keeping those legs turning for extra yardage and falling forward. So maybe break tackle rate and yards after contact would be keys to me.
But yes, I would like to 1st downs made and TDs on runs of 2 to 4 yards.
What they need is the offensive line personnel to get them there.
You can analyze this all you want - it's this simple. Play with a competent oline and the number will be there to support it.
Thanks for the brilliant contribution to the discussion!
But yes, I would like to 1st downs made and TDs on runs of 2 to 4 yards.
I think a good metric is TDs inside 10 yard line. The Giants only had 8 of those last year.
Success this year would be the team's total offense cracking the top 15. If that happens to include a rushing attack that finished top 10 it would be a nice bonus - but no one is going to care whether Devin Singletary made All Pro if this team is still somehow only mustering 15 points a game.
Success this year would be the team's total offense cracking the top 15. If that happens to include a rushing attack that finished top 10 it would be a nice bonus - but no one is going to care whether Devin Singletary made All Pro if this team is still somehow only mustering 15 points a game.
this right here. the most important metrics for singletary are probably going to be staying healthy, not fumbling, and pass blocking since there is no experience behind him. barkley gets kicked around in a multitude of ways but his pass blocking improved a lot over his career and he had long been one of the lowest fumblers at the rb position despite heavy workload.
singletary has 11 fumbles in 888 carries, barkley has 4 in 1201. singletary was credited with 4 sacks allowed last year in 69 attempts, barkley was 2 in 100. singeltary type running backs are a complimentary piece to an offense, he just needs to do his job without making mistakes. id rather he has a lesser statistical season rushing but protects well/doesnt fumble than vice versa.
Success this year would be the team's total offense cracking the top 15. If that happens to include a rushing attack that finished top 10 it would be a nice bonus - but no one is going to care whether Devin Singletary made All Pro if this team is still somehow only mustering 15 points a game.
It matters in that the average yards gained by a top 16 scoring offense over the past 5 seasons is 6100 total yards. And the average rush yards gained by a top 10 rushing offense over that same 5-year period is 2340 yards.
So that puts the statistical burden at about 3750 yards in pass game which, I think is probably a fair floor for Jones. Which would put the pass offense in the historical 14-17 range.
And again those mean averages of all teams, so actuals do vary. But the point is that you have to accrue yards to score points. And if the pass offense is about average, the run game statistically has to produce more.
As far as any individual performance, or really the mix rate, I don't care. But I think the Giants need a productive run game to supplement Jones.
Quote:
Just win games. Throw the ball. Run the ball. Show you can do both. Score early. Score often. Make some big plays. They have the position players to do it at RB, WR and TE.
What they need is the offensive line personnel to get them there.
You can analyze this all you want - it's this simple. Play with a competent oline and the number will be there to support it.
Thanks for the brilliant contribution to the discussion!
And thanks for a brilliant thread.
Quote:
Just win games. Throw the ball. Run the ball. Show you can do both. Score early. Score often. Make some big plays. They have the position players to do it at RB, WR and TE.
What they need is the offensive line personnel to get them there.
You can analyze this all you want - it's this simple. Play with a competent oline and the number will be there to support it.
Thanks for the brilliant contribution to the discussion!
Actually his comments were good. Don't know why you are having an issue with it. If you aren't winning when you are trying to win, you think it matters in the long run if you avaerage more yards per run in a passing league?