NYG has the 6th most expensive offense in 2024

SMH

AAV is the better way to look at this. this is combined offense/defense but if you want to do math you can add up the position units separately and it will give you a more accurate measure.
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/aav/_/year/2024/sort/combined_aav_total - ( New Window )

In comment 16555330 56goat said:

Quote:

SMH

by combined AAV:

2023 = 19th, but with the 6th most injured
2022 = 28th, but with the 9th least injured
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/aav/_/year/2023/sort/combined_aav_total/dir/desc - ( New Window )

The Eagles go from 20 on the first version to 1. 1 is correct.

For Example
Jalen Hurts = cap hit of 13 mil this year, but has a void year in 2029 with a cap hit of 97.5 Million

so the original list is just not a correct way of looking at it

extracted from what should be a complete analysis.

Almost meaningless.

is meaningless, IMO

one year from cuttable and half money saved. I wouldn't call this offense all in spending huge money but it's not exactly cheap either. The OL needs to win the day this season or else. The OL is getting paid. Thomas is long term big money. JMS and Neal hope to be. Runyan and the other FA are making decent to good money. The unit needs to hold this offense together.

Holding people accountable? Just hire the right people. If the right HC is here 1-2 bad years shouldn't change that. 1-2 bad years doesn't necessarily mean they can't coach or GM. Look for progress. Is the roster improving. Is the team getting closer even if it's not linear growth.

McAdoo was fired after 3 bad months. Parcells wasn't fired after one entirely bad season. Dick Vermeil got suffered 2 bad seasons before 1999 if memory serves. Campbell in DET didn't win right away before year 3.

Not to say I am convinced about Daboll yet but ownership needs to be careful with firing guys every time something goes south here. That approach can makes things worse.

Can you criticize the same thing, and/or same guys for it. The offense underperformed. Pick any measure you like.

is because of bad drafting, not an indicator of how good the team is or how good it thinks it is or isn't. Do the Eagles think they're worse than the Giants because they spent less money than the Giants on offense?

about how expensive a team's offense is and only how they have structured their cap. Giants are conservative in their cap structuring. The Eagles have by far the most expensive offense in football - top 5 QB, RB, Tackle, Receiver, TE. They just have pushed all the money forward. I have no idea how expensive the Giants offense is, but it can't be close to the top. Our QB is something like 10 and that drives most of it. We have one player on a "max" contract on offense and that is AT. Everyone else is pretty much rookie or mid range deal.

Let's play the games if the OL is just decent and we stay reasonably healthy we will score points
. If Jones sucks we go to Lock and Schoen gets a QB in 2025

with the cap. Look at the Eagles in comparison, they are punting the can down the road.


Jones $48M, AT $23M, Slayton $8M - $79M

Hurts $13M, Mailata $16M, Brown $12M - $41M

The bigger piece to me is Schoen has modernized and made major investments in the offense for 2024.

We have a $40M QB in his 6th season, an All-Pro caliber LT, a veteran/competent RB, a lottery pick WR, other young WR prospects with promise, and a revamped OL with quality experience.

Now it's time for the players to execute. Because I am confident Daboll will put the players in position to succeed.

In comment 16555589 HBart said:

Quote:

Can you criticize the same thing, and/or same guys for it. The offense underperformed. Pick any measure you like.

The OP was answered here.
There is nothing more to say.