for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Giants Unretire #1 and give to to Malik Nabers

Eric from BBI : Admin : 8/28/2024 7:02 pm
Per NYP.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 <<Prev | Show All |  Next>>
Maybe Nabers didn’t know #1 was not an even number.  
Ivan15 : 8/28/2024 7:33 pm : link
.
RE: RE: I’ve become more of a fan of the ring of honor  
wahl35 : 8/28/2024 7:33 pm : link
In comment 16590119 mfsd said:
Quote:
In comment 16590115 Vin R said:


Quote:


Over retiring a number.. unless that player is the on the level of an LT



I agree


Great, except for the pesky little fact that people play in different eras. Your LT is not someone else's, as Eric stated above. All or none. And I'm not a fan of retiring numbers but once you've gone there ...stick with it or don't
nygiants16.  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 8/28/2024 7:34 pm : link
Thanks.
Players are still wearing 53, 58, and 89, and IMO, they shouldn't be.  
David B. : 8/28/2024 7:34 pm : link
I should care about Ray Flaherty's number?

If his family ok'd it, we should all be fine with it.
Also noting  
JoeyBigBlue : 8/28/2024 7:34 pm : link
That since the NFL changed the jersey numbering system after the 2020 season, more and more players are preferring the single digit numbers they wore in college.

The #1 jersey usually represents the team’s #1 receiver. It can also mean the team’s #1 cornerback. This is why a ton of players are using #1 like Jamarr Chase, Stefon Diggs, Sauce Gardner, and Jaylon Johnson.
Wow  
90.Cal : 8/28/2024 7:34 pm : link
Pretty cool. Time to order my first jersey in years…
I'd unretire all the numbers except for LT's 56  
US1 Giants : 8/28/2024 7:35 pm : link
Unretiring one of the many retired numbers is strange though.
RE: Players are still wearing 53, 58, and 89, and IMO, they shouldn't be.  
Vin R : 8/28/2024 7:38 pm : link
In comment 16590129 David B. said:
Quote:
I should care about Ray Flaherty's number?

If his family ok'd it, we should all be fine with it.


And 17…
There are really people that care about this?  
Big Rick in FL : 8/28/2024 7:40 pm : link
Who gives a shit? The guy played 90 years ago. He wore 3 different numbers in 6 years with the Giants.
Wasn't expecting that,  
darren in pdx : 8/28/2024 7:41 pm : link
numbers aren't that big of a deal to me, but I also agree that unretiring all numbers would make the most sense from here on out if the surviving players agreed. The Ring of Honor fulfills the same purpose and the players will still be recognized by the number they played with.

I like Nabers so far and hope that he doesn't bust when the real games begin.
I still think Jones should give up #8 in hopes of changing his luck.  
Ivan15 : 8/28/2024 7:42 pm : link
Worth a gamble.
Billy Martin  
Fred-in-Florida : 8/28/2024 7:45 pm : link
.
A number really shouldn't be retired after 4 years  
Big Rick in FL : 8/28/2024 7:48 pm : link
of a player wearing it IMO.

Numbers should be retired for players like Rosey Brown, LT, Eli Manning, Michael Strahan. Guys that play here for 12+ years wearing the same number & win multiple titles. I know Rosey didn't win multiple titles, but the dude was a 9 time All-Pro & 9 time Pro Bowler.

Rosters are getting bigger and bigger. It's going to be impossible to keep all numbers retired.
RE: I know... old man here who says get off my lawn  
Mike in Prescott : 8/28/2024 7:49 pm : link
In comment 16590055 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
but not crazy about unretiring numbers unless you do them all.


My thought for a while has been to unretire all numbers and have them on the ring of honor; and not reassign ring of honor numbers as long as that player is alive. I think that respects the intent and something of the tradition of a retired number.
RE: I know... old man here who says get off my lawn  
Sec 103 : 8/28/2024 7:49 pm : link
In comment 16590055 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
but not crazy about unretiring numbers unless you do them all.

100% agreed
Old guy here …  
Beezer : 8/28/2024 7:52 pm : link
and I love this.

LFG!!!
Just saw this too that adds another wrinkle..  
darren in pdx : 8/28/2024 7:52 pm : link
"Ray Flaherty Jr. officially on Wednesday gave his blessings to Mara and the franchise, which intends to return his father’s No. 1 to retirement again once Nabers’ Giants career ends. “Re-retired if you will,” Flaherty Jr. told the Post. "
Number will be re-retired when Nabers is no longer with Giants - ( New Window )
RE: RE: ...  
Go Terps : 8/28/2024 7:52 pm : link
In comment 16590108 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
In comment 16590101 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:


Quote:


Eh, I don't know. I know who Flaherty is because a buddy of mine went to 'Zaga & he's in their sports Hall of Fame. When I visited him in college, that's how I learned of him.

I doubt most Giant fans know who Flaherty is or even his #. I sure AF didn't know the latter.



It's not that. Usually when a player jersey number is retired, like Simms or LT, there is a ceremony with the owner saying "no Giant will ever wear this number again."

Liar, liar pants on fire.

100 years from now, fans will be saying, "I've never heard of Simms. Big deal."

If you do it for one, you should do it for all.


I agree with this. I think this is pretty cheesy from everyone involved.
RE: There are really people that care about this?  
BlackLight : 8/28/2024 7:53 pm : link
In comment 16590141 Big Rick in FL said:
Quote:
Who gives a shit? The guy played 90 years ago. He wore 3 different numbers in 6 years with the Giants.


I will say, that he wore three numbers in six years seems like a relevant bit of data.

Flaherty seems like the type of player that a team Ring Of Honor was designed to recognize.
RE: I'd unretire all the numbers except for LT's 56  
Beer Man : 8/28/2024 7:54 pm : link
In comment 16590134 US1 Giants said:
Quote:
Unretiring one of the many retired numbers is strange though.
I would rather they would retire a number for as long as the player is living, but then make it available again following the players passing.
RE: I still think Jones should give up #8 in hopes of changing his luck.  
DavidinBMNY : 8/28/2024 7:54 pm : link
In comment 16590143 Ivan15 said:
Quote:
Worth a gamble.
Jones should give up #8 for witness protection.
RE: I’m usually not a unretire a jersey guy  
Reale01 : 8/28/2024 7:55 pm : link
In comment 16590084 JoeyBigBlue said:
Quote:
But in this case the guy played 90 years ago. The number has been retired long enough. Same for #4 and #7.


7 is Mel Hein, totally different animal. I think 4 was retired because the player was killed in ww2.
RE: RE: I'd unretire all the numbers except for LT's 56  
Spider43 : 8/28/2024 7:57 pm : link
In comment 16590169 Beer Man said:
Quote:
In comment 16590134 US1 Giants said:


Quote:


Unretiring one of the many retired numbers is strange though.

I would rather they would retire a number for as long as the player is living, but then make it available again following the players passing.


LT will never die! GRRR!
RE: Just saw this too that adds another wrinkle..  
BlackLight : 8/28/2024 7:57 pm : link
In comment 16590162 darren in pdx said:
Quote:
"Ray Flaherty Jr. officially on Wednesday gave his blessings to Mara and the franchise, which intends to return his father’s No. 1 to retirement again once Nabers’ Giants career ends. “Re-retired if you will,” Flaherty Jr. told the Post. " Number will be re-retired when Nabers is no longer with Giants - ( New Window )


Not to think too far ahead - but what if Nabers winds up having a HOF-worthy career with the Giants, finishing atop the team record books in multiple receiving categories - with a couple Super Bowl rings and other accolades?

Basically, what if he winds up being the Eli Manning of New York Giants receivers? Who gets to keep the number?
Video of Nabers wearing #1  
Matt123 : 8/28/2024 7:58 pm : link
From the Giants youtube:

Nabers new number - ( New Window )
A number is un-retired  
M.S. : 8/28/2024 8:00 pm : link
For a rookie?

Paaaaalease



I'm sick of all these college football numbers in the NFL  
Cyrus the Great : 8/28/2024 8:02 pm : link
Go back to the old numbering scheme. He's a receiver, he should wear something from 10-19 or 80-89.
RE: I’m usually not a unretire a jersey guy  
SteelGiant : 8/28/2024 8:03 pm : link
In comment 16590084 JoeyBigBlue said:
Quote:
But in this case the guy played 90 years ago. The number has been retired long enough. Same for #4 and #7.


I agree, they should pick amount of years, a little earlier than 90 in my opinion. Make it a celebration and do it when people who watch that player are old men and let those fans reminace in the greatness, and get those numbers back in cycle.

I was was a little kid watching Taylor play and helped make me a giants fan. It would be cool if I lived to my late 80s and got to see the celebration of his unretired number. The people who are younger than me will get to see Eli and Strahan number go back in.

Now that we are finally doing it, it has to go to a potentially worthy candidate. Nabers was drafted to be the new face of the franchise. If not him then who?

Let's Go Giants, current and past
Come on guys  
DavidinBMNY : 8/28/2024 8:06 pm : link
How many of the people using this site, have more then video replays of players from the 60's and famous pictures and stories from fmilies of these original retired numbers.

The family was in favor of it. I recall reading about Flaherty in a historical Giants book I still have, but thats it.

If the family supports it, so should we.
.  
Go Terps : 8/28/2024 8:07 pm : link
If he had asked for #11, would they give it to him?
If with the passing of time  
Beer Man : 8/28/2024 8:07 pm : link
the majority of fans have to lookup the player on Google just to know who he is, then maybe it is time to move that player's number to the "Ring of Fame" and make the number available again.
The #1 on a Giants jersey looks awesome  
Big Rick in FL : 8/28/2024 8:07 pm : link
RE: ...  
eric2425ny : 8/28/2024 8:09 pm : link
In comment 16590062 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:
Quote:
I heard Nabers wanted #8, but John told him he couldn't have it because that # belongs to family.

I kid. Lighten up.


lol, I laughed too hard at this. He’s like the Olive Garden of QB’s.
RE: I still think Jones should give up #8 in hopes of changing his luck.  
eric2425ny : 8/28/2024 8:10 pm : link
In comment 16590143 Ivan15 said:
Quote:
Worth a gamble.


How about #17. Would complete the puzzle.
RE: .  
JoeyBigBlue : 8/28/2024 8:13 pm : link
In comment 16590188 Go Terps said:
Quote:
If he had asked for #11, would they give it to him?



A generation of Giants fans have a connection to Simms. I don't think there are many people alive that a connection with Flaherty.
RE: RE: RE: ...  
4xchamps : 8/28/2024 8:13 pm : link
In comment 16590113 wahl35 said:
Quote:
In comment 16590108 Eric from BBI said:


Quote:


In comment 16590101 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:


Quote:


Eh, I don't know. I know who Flaherty is because a buddy of mine went to 'Zaga & he's in their sports Hall of Fame. When I visited him in college, that's how I learned of him.

I doubt most Giant fans know who Flaherty is or even his #. I sure AF didn't know the latter.



It's not that. Usually when a player jersey number is retired, like Simms or LT, there is a ceremony with the owner saying "no Giant will ever wear this number again."

Liar, liar pants on fire.

100 years from now, fans will be saying, "I've never heard of Simms. Big deal."

If you do it for one, you should do it for all.



Exactly, You've hit the nail on the head


This isn't that kind of situation. The family "green-lighted" him getting the number. Maybe some families wouldn't want to do that.
RE: RE: RE: ...  
JoeyBigBlue : 8/28/2024 8:14 pm : link
In comment 16590163 Go Terps said:
Quote:
In comment 16590108 Eric from BBI said:


Quote:


In comment 16590101 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:


Quote:


Eh, I don't know. I know who Flaherty is because a buddy of mine went to 'Zaga & he's in their sports Hall of Fame. When I visited him in college, that's how I learned of him.

I doubt most Giant fans know who Flaherty is or even his #. I sure AF didn't know the latter.



It's not that. Usually when a player jersey number is retired, like Simms or LT, there is a ceremony with the owner saying "no Giant will ever wear this number again."

Liar, liar pants on fire.

100 years from now, fans will be saying, "I've never heard of Simms. Big deal."

If you do it for one, you should do it for all.



I agree with this. I think this is pretty cheesy from everyone involved.


Also did you have a problem when the Broncos did it for Peyton Manning?
Its a curious case.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 8/28/2024 8:15 pm : link
I'm gonna be honest, i dont think theres any way to understand Ray Flaherty having his number retired unless you lived in that era. Its so long ago that just looking at his biography does not tell a story thst you would think justifies it.
The problem isn’t Nabers asking for a retired number  
HardTruth : 8/28/2024 8:17 pm : link
The problem is John Mara allowing it and calling the family personally about it.


This is once again favoritism. Does anyone really believe that if our say 6th round draft choice asked for #1 that John Mara would have called the family and asked for it?

You have a retired number, well then you have a retired number. It shouldn’t be about who asks for it.

It also means that all along the way no one wanted to tell Nabers no because it’s not like he went up and first asked John Mara for #1. So how did it even get to John Mara that Malik Nabers wanted #1?
.  
Danny Kanell : 8/28/2024 8:17 pm : link
I’m personally not a fan of this.

Get off my lawn, I guess.
RE: I'm sick of all these college football numbers in the NFL  
Vin R : 8/28/2024 8:18 pm : link
In comment 16590182 Cyrus the Great said:
Quote:
Go back to the old numbering scheme. He's a receiver, he should wear something from 10-19 or 80-89.


I actually agree…

Can’t wait until the NFL allows ads on uniforms…
RE: RE: .  
Go Terps : 8/28/2024 8:18 pm : link
In comment 16590197 JoeyBigBlue said:
Quote:
In comment 16590188 Go Terps said:


Quote:


If he had asked for #11, would they give it to him?




A generation of Giants fans have a connection to Simms. I don't think there are many people alive that a connection with Flaherty.


And 50 years from now no one will have a connection to Simms. Does the number stay retired or not?

Look none of this is the end of the world. It's just kind of lame. It's lame of the Giants to unretire the number, and it's lame of Nabers to still want the number even though he knew it was retired. It's just not a good look.

Whatever.
RE: I know... old man here who says get off my lawn  
4xchamps : 8/28/2024 8:18 pm : link
In comment 16590055 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
but not crazy about unretiring numbers unless you do them all.


Eric, I don't understand. The family gave their blessing. You think that makes it ok to just unretire everyone's jersey? If the family is fine with it, why would you or I even care?
RE: RE: RE: RE: ...  
Go Terps : 8/28/2024 8:19 pm : link
In comment 16590201 JoeyBigBlue said:
Quote:

Also did you have a problem when the Broncos did it for Peyton Manning?


I had no idea they had. If that's true, then yeah it's lame from the Broncos and from Peyton.
RE: The problem isn’t Nabers asking for a retired number  
Ten Ton Hammer : 8/28/2024 8:20 pm : link
In comment 16590206 HardTruth said:
Quote:
The problem is John Mara allowing it and calling the family personally about it.


This is once again favoritism. Does anyone really believe that if our say 6th round draft choice asked for #1 that John Mara would have called the family and asked for it?

You have a retired number, well then you have a retired number. It shouldn’t be about who asks for it.

It also means that all along the way no one wanted to tell Nabers no because it’s not like he went up and first asked John Mara for #1. So how did it even get to John Mara that Malik Nabers wanted #1?


Of course its favoritism. Who ever said everyone is treated the same in sports? Everyone understands a different standard exists for first round draft picks than a 6th round pick. The heirarchy of sports is talent-based.
The next time the Giants retire a number, what will be the big deal?  
Go Terps : 8/28/2024 8:22 pm : link
"No one will wear this number again...for a while."
RE: RE: RE: .  
JoeyBigBlue : 8/28/2024 8:24 pm : link
In comment 16590211 Go Terps said:
Quote:
And 50 years from now no one will have a connection to Simms. Does the number stay retired or not?

Look none of this is the end of the world. It's just kind of lame. It's lame of the Giants to unretire the number, and it's lame of Nabers to still want the number even though he knew it was retired. It's just not a good look.

Whatever.


It's a fair point, but at least 50 years from now people will have video of Simms winning Super Bowl 21 against the Broncos. We don't have anything for Flaherty.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: ...  
HardTruth : 8/28/2024 8:27 pm : link
In comment 16590214 Go Terps said:
Quote:
In comment 16590201 JoeyBigBlue said:


Quote:



Also did you have a problem when the Broncos did it for Peyton Manning?



I had no idea they had. If that's true, then yeah it's lame from the Broncos and from Peyton.


Peyton Manning is a very different scenario. Manning was already a first ballot Hall of Famer and considered one of the best QBs of all time when that occurred. He had already wore #18 while accomplishing all of that.

Malik Nabers hasn’t caught an NFL pass for the NY Giants.

And it was already a story about #18 before Manning signed with Denver. Tripucka wanted him to wear #18 as a result and Manning did not want to wear and even called Tripucka to tell him he didn’t want to wear it.

“When Peyton Manning called up Frank Tripucka in the spring of 2012, he told the Broncos' first franchise quarterback that he didn't want to wear No. 18, the number Manning had worn for 14 seasons in Indianapolis. The number he had as he won four NFL MVPs and one Super Bowl.

Out of respect for the game and its former players, Manning believed Tripucka's retired Denver Broncos No. 18 jersey should remain out of circulation - no matter what Manning had done as a quarterback with that number.

But the original No. 18 insisted - there was a short list of players he'd consider to wear his number and the former Colts quarterback who would now be on his favorite team was at the top.

"I'd be honored. You're my kind of quarterback, and I insist you wear it," recalled Chris Tripucka of his father's response to Manning.

But there was one caveat.

"Peyton, being the guy he is, asked my dad if there was anything he could do to repay him for using the No. 18," said Chris, the youngest of seven Tripucka children who was a wide receiver at Boston College and is now father to two football stars of his own - Shane and Nicholas (also a No. 18).

His father's request for a championship was exactly what you'd expect from an NFL quarterback

"Yeah, go out and win a Super Bowl for me."

So Manning did.”

"It really goes against everything I believe in being a guy who appreciates the history of football and I believe when a number is retired it should stay retired; but in talking to Frank Tripucka, I feel he really wants me to wear his number," Manning said at his introductory press conference. "It was a very humbling conversation and I am honored to wear his number, being another quarterback for the Denver Broncos as Mr. Tripucka was back years ago as the first quarterback to play here. It truly is an honor for me and I'm really following his wishes to wear it because that's what he wants me to do and I'm honored to do that."

It’s a very different situation
RE: RE: The problem isn’t Nabers asking for a retired number  
Go Terps : 8/28/2024 8:28 pm : link
In comment 16590216 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
In comment 16590206 HardTruth said:


Quote:


The problem is John Mara allowing it and calling the family personally about it.


This is once again favoritism. Does anyone really believe that if our say 6th round draft choice asked for #1 that John Mara would have called the family and asked for it?

You have a retired number, well then you have a retired number. It shouldn’t be about who asks for it.

It also means that all along the way no one wanted to tell Nabers no because it’s not like he went up and first asked John Mara for #1. So how did it even get to John Mara that Malik Nabers wanted #1?



Of course its favoritism. Who ever said everyone is treated the same in sports? Everyone understands a different standard exists for first round draft picks than a 6th round pick. The heirarchy of sports is talent-based.


Ray Flaherty is in the Hall of Fame. Malik Nabers hasn't even played a down in the NFL, and I'd bet doesn't ever become a Hall of Famer.

The Giants just unretired a Hall of Fame player's number for a rookie who's never done a thing. It's just not a good look.
RE: The problem isn’t Nabers asking for a retired number  
nygiants16 : 8/28/2024 8:29 pm : link
In comment 16590206 HardTruth said:
Quote:
The problem is John Mara allowing it and calling the family personally about it.


This is once again favoritism. Does anyone really believe that if our say 6th round draft choice asked for #1 that John Mara would have called the family and asked for it?

You have a retired number, well then you have a retired number. It shouldn’t be about who asks for it.

It also means that all along the way no one wanted to tell Nabers no because it’s not like he went up and first asked John Mara for #1. So how did it even get to John Mara that Malik Nabers wanted #1?


They did tell Nabers no and Nabers dropped it and dint ask for it..

Even when they rbought him into Mara's office to tell him, he told them he didnt want to bother the family with it and push it but Mara said the family gave their blessing...

and a big reason the family said yes was because everyone was going to talk about Flaherty again and a whole generation of fans were going to learn about him becaus eof this...

You can spin negatively all you want but Nabers didnt push for it and the family is happy to un retire the number
Pages: 1 2 3 4 <<Prev | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner