They voted for who they thought the top 5 are. Not surprising at all the Giants didn't get any votes that said they were one of the top 5. I'm not sure if even in their best years they would have been ranked top 5.
These are well run teams who have made solid personnel decisions on a consistent basis. My guess is the Giants are among the bottom five with Carolina, Indianapolis, Cleveland and Jacksonville rounding out the group in no particular order.
The poll is clearly not about the morals of the people in the front office, but their ability to build a solid organization and good team and not be firing people every other year. KC was a playoff team the season before Mahomes became the full time starter. He didn't pull them out of nowhere.
They voted for who they thought the top 5 are. Not surprising at all the Giants didn't get any votes that said they were one of the top 5. I'm not sure if even in their best years they would have been ranked top 5.
....more or less invented the practice of regularly evaluating their red chip players in a way that demonstrates courage in the face of losing such players in free agency and retaining them only at a number that makes sense.
I have to laugh when Schoen is criticized because some find the notion of 'go get the best deal you can and give us a shot to match it' absurd. I would say NYG front office didn't handle the process well with Barkley, but the strategy is proven.
The above, plus Bisciotti makes it a point, as a subject matter expert in recruitment, to help his people build up to the next job. Listen to Eric DeCosta talk on Dimitroff's podcast on advice he received as he was being groomed to take over from O.Newsom.
Always admired that organization. Not sure they have drafted as well of late, and I don't like their identity crisis on offense, but as we know the draft in particular can be a little cyclical.
For the last 10 years our front office has been abysmal.
They voted for who they thought the top 5 are. Not surprising at all the Giants didn't get any votes that said they were one of the top 5. I'm not sure if even in their best years they would have been ranked top 5.
Respondents were not allowed to vote for their own team.
The poll is clearly not about the morals of the people in the front office, but their ability to build a solid organization and good team and not be firing people every other year. KC was a playoff team the season before Mahomes became the full time starter. He didn't pull them out of nowhere.
You say they are a mess everyday.
Quote:
They voted for who they thought the top 5 are. Not surprising at all the Giants didn't get any votes that said they were one of the top 5. I'm not sure if even in their best years they would have been ranked top 5.
Maybe because they are fat, drunk and stupid.
And that's no way to go through life.
I have to laugh when Schoen is criticized because some find the notion of 'go get the best deal you can and give us a shot to match it' absurd. I would say NYG front office didn't handle the process well with Barkley, but the strategy is proven.
The above, plus Bisciotti makes it a point, as a subject matter expert in recruitment, to help his people build up to the next job. Listen to Eric DeCosta talk on Dimitroff's podcast on advice he received as he was being groomed to take over from O.Newsom.
Always admired that organization. Not sure they have drafted as well of late, and I don't like their identity crisis on offense, but as we know the draft in particular can be a little cyclical.
Ha ha... well played.