Dexter didn't sound too thrilled after that Dallas game. I suspect he wasn't too thrilled last night. Hell, before Week 1, AT made some comments that I thought sounded like, 'Stop scapegoating the OL for the offensive issues. It's not just us.'
One can see this coming a mile down the road.
These dudes aren't idiots. They see what we see, even more considering practice. They have friends and family who are probably wisecracking to them, 'Helluva QB you got there. Haha.'
The players always know who can play and who can't
locker room has ever fully rallied behind Jones. Go back to KT's comments about him getting a contract ahead of Saquon, that was after his best season and a playoff win...
that Daniel Jones may not be the guy. What is Nabers supposed to say to that question? He said the Giants will figure it out. You guys all make it sound like Nabers went out of his way to criticize Jones. He didn't. Use Thibodeaux as an example. That's fine. Use Dex as an example. That's fine. Use Thomas as an example if he was the one that said that the OL is a scapegoat. That's fine. Using Nabers is just trying to form an opinion first and then use this clip to justify your opinion. Nabers quote belongs nowhere near this topic.
Yeah, this is why I’m a Giants fan. Burrow is maybe the best QB in the league right now, the Bengals are red hot and the D holds them to 17 in an heroic effort. All we need are 18 measly points. L. F******
Give a big fuck you to the ownership and all their inbreeds running the organization. What does he have to lose? He'll be shit canned anyway the way the season is going...
Give a big fuck you to the ownership and all their inbreeds running the organization. What does he have to lose? He'll be shit canned anyway the way the season is going...
I kinda got that impression from him the way he was calling plays last night.
It was almost like his strategy was: "I'm fucked anyway - might as well just gamble on everything..."
He should've just deactivated whatever the punter's name is.
RE: RE: RE: To summarize, he was specifically asked about
anything too overt or dramatic. Maybe a player will demand a trade. But I do imagine that it just weighs on the player in subtle psychological/motivational ways. Or perhaps more to the point, a true franchise QB who's better than Jones is probably very beneficial in psychological/motivational ways.
The more he doesn’t win, the more likely they are to dump players at reasonable contracts to contending teams. Slayton, Singetary, Pinnock, anyone decent that would help another team.
Free up cap and pick up 2 or 3 picks and at that point, you throw Divito in and see what he can do.
As they will be needing a qb, helping them improve their draft position along with accumulating picks is the only game to play.
This will come from ownership. He would be foolish to make the move and if it backfired he would be gone for sure. I think this has been already discussed. Mara isn’t making a change to appease people on BBI who feel they are the voice of the fanbase.
RE: RE: To summarize, he was specifically asked about
This will come from ownership. He would be foolish to make the move and if it backfired he would be gone for sure. I think this has been already discussed. Mara isn’t making a change to appease people on BBI who feel they are the voice of the fanbase.
John Mara would never make a move at quarterback in reaction to the fans.
Quote:
The Giants were booed off the field at halftime, and to be clear, they earned that send off. They had two chances to score in the final two minutes and blew them both.
First, they had a 48-yard field goal attempt ruined by the usually reliable Zak DeOssie. He snapped high on the attempt, and while holder Daniel Jones made a nice play to get the ball down, kicker Alrick Rosas missed the 48-yard attempt wide left.
But the defense actually forced a Bills punt, which returned T.J. Jones returned 60 yards to the Bills 32. The Giants had plenty of time and another chance ... until Manning’s pass was intercepted by a diving defensive tackle Ed Oliver.
and lets see what happens.Nabers,Slayton and Robinson play together again. The Nabers loss is a big one.
Yes, that will help them win a few more games
It doesn’t mean the the QB is any better
In fact, it means replacing him is more difficult
The ugly truth is tanking or injuries are the best way to get your QB
Talk all you want about the misses - but the Bears and Commanders feel a lot better about their future than the Giants
the problem with him coming back is the misconception that Jones is a good QB and can get it done. Nabers is making Jones better, not the other way around and it skews the perception of the QB play
He sucks. I still don’t know what they even signed him. He’s had 1-2 decent games in his entire career. He’s got no upside. DeVito at least has something. DeVito or don’t bother.
One can see this coming a mile down the road.
These dudes aren't idiots. They see what we see, even more considering practice. They have friends and family who are probably wisecracking to them, 'Helluva QB you got there. Haha.'
The locker room may fracture but there's no quick fix by switching out a below-average QB for a bad QB. Except to get people pining to get DJ back.
Here we go again. No he didn't.
TBH I feel they'd rally more behind DeVito than Lock.
Quote:
I think that Emmanuel Acho comment has some play around the locker room. Guys aren't stupid.
Here we go again. No he didn't.
*sigh* Link below.
Nabers commenting on QB situation pre-draft - ( New Window )
Quote:
In comment 16647339 FStubbs said:
Quote:
I think that Emmanuel Acho comment has some play around the locker room. Guys aren't stupid.
Here we go again. No he didn't.
*sigh* Link below. Nabers commenting on QB situation pre-draft - ( New Window )
And for the millionth time, did you see the whole interview? I'm assuming not. This is the Mandela Effect.
You're not serious.
Think he says "they'll figure it out" if they mentioned Kansas City, San Diego, or Buffalo?
Quote:
what the Giants will do at QB and Nabers said they'll figure it out. Oh, the horror.
You're not serious.
Think he says "they'll figure it out" if they mentioned Kansas City, San Diego, or Buffalo?
Amazing.
TBH I feel they'd rally more behind DeVito than Lock.
I believe this to be true. Good observation!
Plenty of players were here last year when they won games they werent supposed to win with defense and backup QBs.
Yeah, this is why I’m a Giants fan. Burrow is maybe the best QB in the league right now, the Bengals are red hot and the D holds them to 17 in an heroic effort. All we need are 18 measly points. L. F******
I'd throw DeVito in there immediately without giving it a second thought.
Pay $80 million to Jones to hold a clipboard. Not even being a dick about this - I'm serial.
Parcells benched Simms in '83.
I dunno where I'm going with this.
I kinda got that impression from him the way he was calling plays last night.
It was almost like his strategy was: "I'm fucked anyway - might as well just gamble on everything..."
He should've just deactivated whatever the punter's name is.
Quote:
In comment 16647390 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
what the Giants will do at QB and Nabers said they'll figure it out. Oh, the horror.
You're not serious.
Think he says "they'll figure it out" if they mentioned Kansas City, San Diego, or Buffalo?
Amazing.
Thanks for conceding. Have a nice day!
Quote:
doesn't mean a QB switch will brighten their moods. Most likely they realize this is a zombie season no matter which guy is the QB.
Parcells benched Simms in '83.
I dunno where I'm going with this.
Parcells was a first year coach as well, but sure, if somehow benching Jones had the same effect, I'd be for it.
Who's LT in this scenario, though? LOL
Free up cap and pick up 2 or 3 picks and at that point, you throw Divito in and see what he can do.
As they will be needing a qb, helping them improve their draft position along with accumulating picks is the only game to play.
They know Jones is not the answer.
Quote:
what the Giants will do at QB and Nabers said they'll figure it out. Oh, the horror.
You're not serious.
Think he says "they'll figure it out" if they mentioned Kansas City, San Diego, or Buffalo?
John Mara would never make a move at quarterback in reaction to the fans.
First, they had a 48-yard field goal attempt ruined by the usually reliable Zak DeOssie. He snapped high on the attempt, and while holder Daniel Jones made a nice play to get the ball down, kicker Alrick Rosas missed the 48-yard attempt wide left.
But the defense actually forced a Bills punt, which returned T.J. Jones returned 60 yards to the Bills 32. The Giants had plenty of time and another chance ... until Manning’s pass was intercepted by a diving defensive tackle Ed Oliver.
Quote:
In comment 16647436 BlackLight said:
Quote:
doesn't mean a QB switch will brighten their moods. Most likely they realize this is a zombie season no matter which guy is the QB.
Parcells benched Simms in '83.
I dunno where I'm going with this.
Parcells was a first year coach as well, but sure, if somehow benching Jones had the same effect, I'd be for it.
Who's LT in this scenario, though? LOL
LOL well a lot of people here seem to think Dexy is a first ballot HOFer so maybe he's better than LT?
Yes, that will help them win a few more games
It doesn’t mean the the QB is any better
In fact, it means replacing him is more difficult
The ugly truth is tanking or injuries are the best way to get your QB
Talk all you want about the misses - but the Bears and Commanders feel a lot better about their future than the Giants
I don't care if you put Jerry Rice out there, Jones is still going to be a lousy QB.
Its duct taping the bumper to the Yugo.
Its still a pos, but slightly better.
That's a crazy assertion to make.